CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 16 mai 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s8BB6D734 { margin-right:9pt; margin-left:9pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .s32126D70 { height:47.75pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .s316F6575 { height:32.15pt } .s560E5D7A { height:28.85pt } .sDB9E4500 { height:32.6pt } .sB6A7263B { height:23.3pt } .sFC4B6575 { height:35.05pt } .sDC826575 { height:31.35pt } .s5395D7A { height:25.45pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 61961/15 Cristian PETRACHI against Romania and 11 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 16   May 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). By letters sent by registered post on the dates indicated in the appended table the applicants were invited to inform the Court about any developments or changes in their situation at the domestic level. The applicant in application no. 9037/16 was also asked to send copies of documents pertaining to his release from prison. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 6 June 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Date of the applicant’s last letter Date of the Court’s registered letter   Date of receipt of the registered letter Time-limit for submission by the applicant of the information requested 1. 61961/15 05/07/2016 Cristian Petrachi 02/07/1987 12/09/2016 23/01/2019 29/01/2019 20/02/2019 2. 3735/16 09/02/2016 István Borcsa 23/06/1986 09/02/2016 16/01/2019 04/02/2019 13/02/2019 3. 273/16 25/01/2016 Adrian Gândac 12/07/1984 11/05/2016 11/02/2019 14/02/2019 11/03/2019 4. 5703/16 25/02/2016 Gheorghe Drăgușanu 19/09/1981 27/07/2016 24/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 05/03/2019 21/02/2019 5. 7932/16 09/03/2016 Tiberiu-Carol Kallai 10/07/1981 09/03/2016 21/01/2019 25/01/2019 18/02/2019 6. 9037/16 29/02/2016 Dumitru Stoian 05/01/1981 16/05/2018 23/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 20/02/2019 20/02/2019       7. 11131/16 10/03/2016 Manole-Alexandru Frunză 26/09/1987 18/04/2017 24/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 12/02/2019 21/02/2019 8. 12251/16 29/03/2016 Adrian Vulpe 16/06/1973 29/03/2016 24/01/2019 04/02/2019 21/02/2019 9. 14178/16 03/05/2016 Secret Rostaș 24/09/1993 06/07/2016 21/01/2019 30/01/2019 18/02/2019 10. 15475/16 21/06/2016 Florin Crăciun 13/01/1985 25/04/2017 16/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 20/02/2019 13/02/2019 11. 39207/16 29/08/2016 Ionuț-Marius Nechita 09/10/1984 10/04/2017 22/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 19/02/2019 19/02/2019 12. 9136/16 05/04/2016 Luca Samoilă 13/10/1971   06/07/2017 24/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 26/02/2019 21/02/2019