CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 juin 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606DEC000026616
- Date
- 6 juin 2019
- Publication
- 6 juin 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sD407E162 { width:116.42pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2D726B78 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 266/16 Răzvan-Sergiu RUSU against Romania and 13 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 6   June   2019 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). By letters sent by registered post on the dates indicated in the appended table the applicants were invited to inform the Court about any developments or changes in their situation at the domestic level. The applicant in application no. 4075/16 was also asked to send copies of documents pertaining to his release from prison. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 27 June 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter Time-limit for submission by the applicant of the information requested     266/16 05/02/2016 Răzvan-Sergiu Rusu 08/05/1994     05/02/2016 05/02/2019 18/02/2019 05/03/2019     1255/16 03/05/2016 Sándor-Zsolt Füzesi 24/07/1989 Alexandru Füzesi Târgu-Mureş 03/05/2016 29/01/2019 05/02/2019 26/02/2019     1338/16 17/02/2016 Fănel Trimfă 19/03/1989 Ovidiu Chiriac Braşov 03/08/2016 30/01/2019 06/02/2019 27/02/2019     1736/16 25/01/2016 Radu Drăgan 23/02/1982     25/01/2016 11/02/2019 20/02/2019 11/03/2019     1860/16 31/05/2016 Marius Niculae 27/04/1984     31/05/2016 11/02/2019 14/02/2019 11/03/2019     1871/16 01/02/2016 Neculai Dofteanu 02/12/1976 Maria Horvat Târgu-Ocna 18/10/2016 11/02/2019 15/02/2019 11/03/2019     4075/16 19/04/2016 Ion Borzoș 14/07/1982     06/09/2018 05/02/2019 11/02/2019 05/03/2019     4490/16 02/02/2016 George-Alexandru Pantazi 29/08/1983     11/10/2016 05/02/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 20/02/2019 05/03/2019     4844/16 24/02/2016 Francisc-Carol Stoica 18/11/1973 Irina Maria Peter Bucharest 24/02/2016 06/02/2019 18/02/2019 06/03/2019   5557/16 29/03/2016 Bogdan Dumitru Riza 12/04/1979     29/07/2016 11/02/2019 19/02/2019 11/03/2019   14101/16 05/04/2016 Dumitru-Mitică Constantin 23/11/1983       19/01/2017 06/02/2019 15/02/2019 06/03/2019   14155/16 28/03/2016 Laurențiu-George Cazan 13/12/1980     13/03/2017 28/02/2019 05/03/2019 28/03/2019   14213/16 31/03/2016 Lucian-Cătălin Bălășoiu 06/07/1990     05/05/2017 06/02/2019 21/02/2019 06/03/2019   14218/16 06/04/2016 Vasilică Mîrzac 30/06/1978     06/04/2016 29/01/2019 05/02/2019 26/02/2019    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 6 juin 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606DEC000026616
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral