CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 6 juin 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s79DE5897 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s34D46E87 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .sBB355983 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s583D00FA { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s26FF04E7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s4DAA9627 { width:178.94pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s26725EEE { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .sE729A15B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }         FOURTH SECTION       CASE OF CORNEL POPA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 6920/16 and 9 others - see appended list )             JUDGMENT         STRASBOURG   6 June 2019       This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Cornel Popa and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 16 May 2019, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     Notice of the applications was given to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 3 “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” 7.     The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v.   Croatia [GC], no.   7334/13, §§   96 ‑ 101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article   3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić , cited above, §§   122   ‑ 141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos.   42525/07 and 60800/08, §§   149 ‑ 159, 10   January 2012). 8.     In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos.   61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these applications. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention were inadequate. 10.     These applications are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article   3 of the Convention. III.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 11.     Article   41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” 12.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos.   61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. 13.     The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, 1.     Decides to join the applications;   2.     Declares the applications admissible;   3.     Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention;   4.     Holds (a)     that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)     that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2019, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     6920/16 28/01/2016 Cornel Popa 21/07/1978 Focșani and Mărgineni Prisons 23/04/2015 to 22/04/2016 1 year(s) 1.5-1.69 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, insufficient number of sleeping places 1,000     10441/16 16/05/2016 Zoltan Kovacs 10/05/1991   Represented by Vasile Rareș Biro, Satu Mare Oradea and Satu Mare Prisons 17/03/2015 pending More than 4 year(s) and 23 day(s) 1.16-2 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 3,000     12937/16 21/03/2016 Vilică Duncă 20/09/1971 Dolj County Police, Craiova, Rahova, and Giurgiu Prisons 14/02/2008 pending More than 11 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 27 day(s) 1.37-2.21 m² overcrowding (save for Dolj County Police), no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water 5,000     15657/16 18/04/2016 Aurel Constantin 23/02/1966   Represented by Irina Maria Peter, Bucharest Mărgineni Prison 13/02/2014 pending More than 5 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 28 day(s) 1.69-2.37 m² overcrowding, poor quality of food, insufficient number of sleeping places, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient natural light, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 5,000     20767/16 11/05/2016 Marian Georoceanu 07/07/1964 Craiova Prison 09/11/2007 to 12/06/2018 10 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 4 day(s) 0.93-2.16 m² overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 5,000     20783/16 10/06/2016 Ciprian Stanciu 05/05/1989   Represented by Ionela Mărgărit, Bucharest Galați Prison 27/03/2012 to 01/11/2016 4 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 6 day(s) 1.2-1.63 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to running water, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 3,000     20927/16 05/05/2016 Cornel-Adrian Todoran 14/01/1986 Mureș County Police, Târgu Mureș, Rahova, Gherla, and Aiud Prisons 24/02/2010 pending More than 9 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 16 day(s) 1.82-2.6 m² overcrowding (save for Mureș County Police), poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 5,000     21581/16 23/05/2016 Mihăiţă Dinu 09/03/1971 Bucharest 12th Police Section, Buzău County Police, Rahova, Jilava, and Colibași Prison Hospitals, and Rahova, Slobozia, Giurgiu, Jilava, Târgu Jiu, Craiova, Focșani, and Găești Prisons 05/08/2011 to 26/09/2017 6 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 22 day(s) 1.3 - 2.79 m² overcrowding (save for Rahova, Jilava, and Colibași Prison Hospitals), infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to running water, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or inadequate furniture, insufficient number of sleeping places, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of food, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 5,000     22087/16 14/07/2016 Hakan Yiğit 16/06/1972   Represented by Constantina Roxana Yiğit, Brezoi Colibași Prison 21/01/2016 pending More than 3 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 20 day(s) 2.01-2.81 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to warm water, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 3,000   22967/16 20/05/2016 Ion Ţarălungă 20/03/1970 Galați County Police, Târgu-Ocna Prison Hospital, and Galați, Rahova, and Brăila Prisons 21/06/2012 pending More than 6 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 20 day(s) 1.2-2.75 m² overcrowding (save for Târgu-Ocna Prison Hospital), mouldy or dirty cell, lack of privacy for toilet, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack or inadequate recreational space, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light 5,000   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.