CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 juin 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6F7FC1B9 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 10496/18 Sergey Yevgenyevich ASHOVSKIY against Russia and 25 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 20 June 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention during transport. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 July 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case ‑ law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]     10496/18 27/06/2018 Sergey Yevgenyevich Ashovskiy 07/06/1973       21/01/2019 01/04/2019 1,000     22305/18 29/03/2018 Petr Petrovich Kosteletskiy 01/07/1957       14/01/2019 28/03/2019 1,500     26093/18 09/05/2018 Vitaliy Vyacheslavovich Altynbayev 04/08/1981 Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich Pechora Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 14/01/2019 02/04/2019 1,000     26640/18 01/05/2018 Vladimir Viktorovich Ilyin 05/04/1963     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 14/01/2019 11/03/2019 1,000     27838/18 25/05/2018 Pavel Vladimirovich Glazunov 27/11/1974     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 14/01/2019 15/03/2019 1,500     28205/18 24/05/2018 Timur Olegovich Yurtayev 25/05/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 21/01/2019 21/03/2019 1,000     28499/18 04/05/2018 Anton Vladimirovich Alekseyev 06/06/1978 Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 14/01/2019 04/04/2019 1,500     28582/18 28/05/2018 Denis Sergeyevich Chernykh 02/10/1992       14/01/2019 28/03/2019 1,000     29448/18 21/05/2018 Sergey Gennadyevich Alekseyev 26/05/1992     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 21/01/2019 12/03/2019 1,000   29467/18 21/05/2018 Gennadiy Anatolyevich Savinov 20/10/1969     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 21/01/2019 12/03/2019 1,000   31026/18 12/06/2018 Islam Mutagirovich Davudov 29/07/1969     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 22/01/2019 18/03/2019 1,000   31109/18 14/06/2018 Sergey Aleksandrovich Shmykov 10/10/1960     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 22/01/2019 12/03/2019 1,000   31322/18 13/06/2018 Dmitriy Mikhaylovich Shmarlovskiy 07/09/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 22/01/2019 18/03/2019 1,000   31700/18 24/06/2018 Yevgeniy Viktorovich Butko 01/08/1983     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 22/01/2019 11/04/2019 1,000   31858/18 25/05/2018 Yuriy Sergeyevich Matveyev 05/12/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 22/01/2019 08/04/2019 1,000   31918/18 25/06/2018 Sergey Yuryevich Averichev 13/08/1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 21/01/2019 18/03/2019 1,000   32574/18 18/06/2018 Sergey Vasilyevich Izyurov 09/11/1977     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 29/01/2019 07/03/2019 1,000   33093/18 26/06/2018 Ruslan Georgiyevich Arutyunyan 19/01/1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 22/01/2019 24/04/2019 1,000   33563/18 21/06/2018 Valentin Sergeyevich Semenov 10/11/1997     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport   22/01/2019 27/03/2019 1,000   33891/18 28/06/2018 Azamat Alvertovich Nurlygayanov 13/09/1989     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 29/01/2019 21/03/2019 1,000   34250/18 01/07/2018 Mikhail Zhamalodinovich Abdulmadzhidov 15/02/1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 29/01/2019 27/03/2019 1,000   34533/18 04/07/2018 Vitaliy Andreyevich Manukh 16/08/1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 29/01/2019 12/03/2019 1,000   35840/18 06/07/2018 Roman Sergeyevich Shangareyev 24/02/1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 29/01/2019 15/03/2019 1,000   36042/18 28/06/2018 Sergey Alekseyevich Grigoryev 28/11/1971     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 05/02/2019 11/04/2019 1,000   36649/18 13/07/2018 Dmitriy Sergeyevich Rochev 15/01/1994     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 11/03/2019 23/04/2019 1,000   37250/18 16/07/2018 Aleksandr Valentinovich Doroshkevichus 22/11/1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport 11/03/2019 29/04/2019 1,000   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.