CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 29 août 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sF2EF8B01 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:11pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s761D06F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:11pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6F7FC1B9 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2C2A4500 { height:31.5pt } .sEFB62F38 { height:32pt } .sCC018295 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION This version was rectified on 24   April 2020 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court. Application no. 112/17 Konstantin Grigoryevich ZUBOV against Russia and 21 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 29   August 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention (see the appended table). They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention, as indicated in the unilateral declarations by the Government, as well as the other complaints under the well-established case-law (see the appended table). The applicant in application no. 26786/18 also raised a complaint under Article 3 of the Convention about the conditions during another period of his detention. The Court has examined this complaint and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, this complaint either does not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles   34 and   35 of the Convention or does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of application no. 26786/18 must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law, as indicated in the unilateral declarations by the Government; Declares the remainder of application no. 26786/18 inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 19 September 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]     112/17 13/04/2018 Konstantin Grigoryevich Zubov 13/07/1989     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/10/2018 15/01/2019 13,750     40587/17 16/12/2017 Sergey Anatolyevich Bondar 03/12/1994       16/07/2018 11/09/2018 10,800     51479/17 05/12/2017 Dilovar Kholmakhmadovich Abdulfayzov 08/12/1995 Korobeynikov Grigoriy Anatolyevich St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/07/2018 25/09/2018 7,000     56923/17 19/07/2017 Nikita Olegovich Kurnovenkov 21/01/1998       13/02/2018 03/05/2018 4,650     438/18 06/12/2017 Vladimir Moiseyevich Karmazin 30/05/1956 Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/07/2018 03/10/2018 5,500     770/18 05/05/2018 Vitaliy Valeryevich Lokhmatov 24/06/1982       09/01/2019 08/04/2019 3,255     1298/18 21/03/2018 Vitaliy Anatolyevich Khaptsov 27/03/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/10/2018 26/02/2019 3,555     9061/18 23/05/2018 Dmitriy Valeryevich Smirnov 08/09/1979     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 09/01/2019 08/04/2019 1,895     10942/18 10/02/2018 Aleksey Nikolayevich Fedorov 27/10/1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention –   09/01/2019 21/03/2019 7,045   10944/18 09/02/2018 Artem Andreyevich Zayats 18/09/1990     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention –   09/01/2019 21/03/2019 13,100   12024/18 17/02/2018 Maksim Vyacheslavovich Ushakov 05/04/1977 Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention –   09/01/2019 21/03/2019 2,890   12194/18 04/02/2018 Maksim Anatolyevich Zhurlov 15/12/1984 [1]     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention –   09/01/2019 30/04/2019 5,900   14681/18 07/03/2018 Dmitriy Yuryevich Koshelev 27/09/1983     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - ,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van and detention in the holding cell to attend court hearings; 0,4 sq.m; 11/09/2017 - 29/10/2017 04/10/2018 26/11/2018 3,100   15725/18 07/03/2018 Aleksandr Sergeyevich Ivanov 24/03/1992 Palmskiy Anatoliy Aleksandrovich St Petersburg   09/01/2019 26/03/2019 5,900   16776/18 14/03/2018 Anton Nikolayevich Kudashov 02/11/1984 Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complaint about poor conditions of transport,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - numerous occasions of transport by van from the detention facility to investigative actions or the courthouses in the period from 24/05/2016 to 15/09/2017; overcrowding; restricted access to toilet; etc. ,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention –   04/10/2018 05/12/2018 6,000   17002/18 21/03/2018 Dmitriy Valeryevich Mikhaylov 06/12/1983   Antonova Yekaterina Vladimirovna St Petersburg   04/10/2018 11/12/2018 1,630   17076/18 28/03/2018 Ivan Denisovich Novozhilov 26/07/1996       04/10/2018 11/12/2018 4,500   19104/18 16/03/2018 Ivan Valeryevich Fedotyev 16/07/1985       04/10/2018 11/01/2019 1,265   26762/18 03/05/2018 Andrey Pavlovich Shubin 02/09/1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 09/01/2019 18/03/2019 1,630   26786/18 17/05/2018 Aleksandr Vladimirovich Novikov 16/09/1955       09/01/2019 23/03/2019 2,890   27478/18 27/05/2018 Aleksandr Vasilyevich Fedortsov 04/08/1947 Chernyshov Yevgeniy Vladimirovich Novocherkassk   09/01/2019 18/04/2019 13,500   27841/18 21/05/2018 Mikhail Zaytsev 17/10/1993 Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/01/2019 20/03/2019 6,500   [1]     Rectified on 24 April 2020: the text was "15/12/1954" [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.