CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 29 août 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6F88BEDC { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE330DFD7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s8BB6D734 { margin-right:9pt; margin-left:9pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .sFE71D34 { border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-left:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#c6c6c6 } .sD7287D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s6C09873C { border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-left:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#c6c6c6 } .sDE9F378B { border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-left:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#c6c6c6 } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sC202EACC { clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 10599/06 Aleksey Aleksandrovich PAKHATINSKIY against Russia and 3 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 29   August 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appended table. On different dates the applicants’ complaints listed in the appended table were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). Between 2011 and 2013 the parties submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the cases. By letters dated 25 October 2017, sent by registered post, the applicants’ representatives and Mr Nikitin, the applicant who was self-represented, were requested to inform the Court whether they wished to maintain the applications. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. These letters were received by the addressees on the dates indicted in the appended table. However, no response followed. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 19 September 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   No. Application no.   Date of introduction Applicant’s name   Date of birth   Represented by   Complaints communicated Date the observations received from the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter   Report on reception Date of the latest correspondence by the applicant 1 10599/06   16/01/2006 Aleksey Aleksandrovich PAKHATINSKIY   10/07/1983   Yevgeniya Vasilyevna SMIRNOVA   Article 3 19/11/2013 25/10/2017 Received by the representative on 09/11/2017, no reply 17/12/2013 2 12796/07   01/02/2007 Aleksandr Viktorovich NIKITIN   21/08/1969     Articles 3 and 13 17/07/2011 25/10/2017 Received by the applicant on 09/11/2017, no reply 17/07/2011 3 27052/07   16/06/2007 Aleksey Sergeyevich STEPANOV   18/02/1979   Ekhtiram Ragim Ogly KASUMOV   Articles 3, 6 § 1 and 13 30/09/2013 25/10/2017 Received by the representative on 13/11/2017, no reply 30/09/2013 4 54241/09   25/09/2009 Aleksey Gennadyevich AVERYANOV   13/06/1973   Aleksandr Gennadyevich AVERYANOV   09/11/1974   Regina Ilgizovna SHAKIROVA   Articles 3 and 13 29/05/2012 25/10/2017 Received by the representative on 20/11/2017, no reply 29/05/2012 APPENDIX