CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 29 août 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6F88BEDC { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE330DFD7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sD407E162 { width:116.42pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2D726B78 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s323F263B { height:27.7pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3465B0A7 { height:17.85pt } .s8934192D { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 13339/15 Marius Alexandru MALACU against Romania and 12 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 29   August 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of certain requested information had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 19 September 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter Time-limit for submission by the applicant of the information requested     13339/15 09/04/2015 Marius Alexandru Malacu 11/09/1986 28/02/2019 18/03/2019 11/04/2019     14214/15 14/04/2015 Radu Dîrjan 01/08/1968 28/02/2019 18/03/2019 11/04/2019     43665/15 31/08/2015 Ionel Ionuț Bulugean 28/10/1980 31/01/2019 27/02/2019 14/03/2019     60578/15 12/04/2016 Dorin Hondru 13/12/1993 28/02/2019 Returned to the Court as “recipient moved” on 04/04/2019 11/04/2019     60951/15 26/07/2016 Cătălin-Iulian Țîrvelea 29/07/1974 21/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 20/02/2019 04/03/2019     129/16 19/01/2016 Ion Hojda 06/02/1992   represented by Vasile Rareș Biro Satu Mare 31/01/2019 20/02/2019 14/03/2019     6541/16 31/03/2016 Petrică Mocanu 25/08/1984 28/02/2019 28/03/2019 11/04/2019     13681/16 06/04/2016 Andrei-Robert Moarţi 22/05/1982 21/01/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 20/02/2019 04/03/2019     15342/16 12/04/2016 Florian-Constantin Stroe 03/04/1982 18/01/2019 05/02/2019 01/03/2019   16183/16 27/04/2016 István Szász 06/08/1974 28/03/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 10/05/2019 25/04/2019   19594/16 18/07/2016 Eugen-Valentin Nițu 24/04/1982 28/02/2019 18/03/2019 11/04/2019   20095/16 17/06/2016 Dănuţ Aldea 19/01/1986 28/03/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 25/04/2019 25/04/2019   51486/16 05/10/2016 Neculai Pandele 05/10/1974 28/02/2019 18/03/2019 11/04/2019