CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 29 août 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s3635F015 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6F7FC1B9 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sD407E162 { width:116.42pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s59272B2C { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 36642/17 Györgyné KOBZA and others against Hungary (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 29   August 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 15   May 2017, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings was communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). THE LAW Complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that the overall length of the relevant period, less than two years and three months, for one level of jurisdiction, has not exceeded a reasonable time within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. In view of the above, the Court finds that this complaint is manifestly ill ‑ founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§   3 and   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 19 September 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 36642/17 15/05/2017 (59 applicants) Gyorgyne Kobza 10/10/1935 Erika Antalné Varga 06/10/1977 Attila István Bekó 07/02/1971 József István Bekó 17/10/1936 Istvánné Bertók 20/01/1941 Mónika Andrea Cselőtei 27/01/1970 Julianna Csizmadia 22/09/1954 Györgyné Dudás 01/12/1954 István Fábián 13/09/1948 Károlyné Gast 09/03/1956 Attila Juhász 26/01/1976 Ferenc Juhász 09/01/1951 Sándorné Kalvach 03/12/1949     Zsuzsanna Ilona Katona 27/09/1959 Sándorné Kiss 17/12/1947 Ferenc Kurucz 04/10/1950 József Kurucz 17/09/1953 Tibor Lászlóné Ligeti 17/08/1953 Ferenc Imréné Márton 14/11/1955 József Molnár 21/08/1962 József Györgyné Molnár 27/01/1933 Krisztina Marianna Molnár 26/02/1979 Zoltán Molnár 19/10/1972 Valéria Erzsébet Murai 27/12/1947 Ferenc Naszádi 10/08/1979 József Naszádi 23/02/1937 Sára Teréz Naszádi 21/07/1980 István Pásztor 27/09/1972 László Pásztor 17/03/1987 Ágnes Paulovics 21/04/1984 Árpádné Richter 10/09/1957 Mária Terézia Rudolfné Katona 04/10/1956 Lászlóné Sas 08/09/1950 Ferenc Sikter 24/08/1945 György Sikter 03/05/1950 László Sikter 01/11/1948 Jánosné Stegmajer 04/01/1973 György Tóth 03/01/1952 Mária Terézia Tóth 27/05/1954 Pálné Tóth 11/08/1928 Ferenc Varga 28/08/1976 Ferencné Varga 14/09/1953 Jánosné Varga 07/09/1954 Krisztina Varga 26/07/1977 Zoltán Varga 16/06/1972 Gyula Lászlóné Vaskó 19/05/1955 István Verebes 12/03/1966 Krisztina Weisz 21/04/1977 László Weisz 27/05/1968 Erzsébet Zana 27/05/1960 Imre Zvoronics 15/07/1955   Household László Horgász 31/10/1981 Mónika Gabriella Horgász 04/02/1973   Household Lajos Kalmár 24/11/1983 Zsolt Kalmár 20/10/1978   Household Sándor János Varga 11/12/1941 Sándorné Varga 15/12/1946   Household György Kobza 25/04/1960 Györgyné Kobza 11/02/1960   Hangyál Edit Budapest 16/03/2017   pending   More than 2 year(s) and 2   month(s) and 27 day(s) 1   level(s) of jurisdiction