CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 12 septembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6F7FC1B9 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s22755BB4 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sD407E162 { width:116.42pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34627/16 Klára KOVÁCS and others against Hungary (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 12   September 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 13   June 2016, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Mr Czirmes, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). The Court received the friendly-settlement declaration under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 3 October 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant / jointly to the heirs of each deceased applicant (in euros) [i] 34627/16 13/06/2016 (48 applicants) Klára Kovács 24/10/1948 Zoltánné Kleb 22/02/1944 Józsefné Köves 01/11/1947 György Bessenyei 10/10/1942 Géza Gulyás 06/10/1948 Attiláné Kovács 17/01/1969 János Papp 19/01/1954 Zoltán Papp 10/02/1952 Klára Zika 12/08/1944 Ferenc Béday 08/09/1971 Jánosné Dolgos 27/03/1946 Márta Lipóth 11/04/1963 Ibolya Horváthné Kovács 25/10/1949 Józsefné Katona 12/08/1938 Béláné Major 07/12/1956 Ferenc Mártonné Szalai 03/08/1955 Tibor Hujsz 06/11/1951 Károlyné Szlukovinyi 05/03/1932 Sándorné Szipola 27/06/1958 Sándorné Hegyi 26/02/1951 András Kovács 12/05/1953 Annamária Kleb 08/02/1970 Zoltánné Péter 28/08/1957 Lajos Szabó 15/01/1955 József Kucserka 12/05/1948 Gyula Weibel 17/01/1946 Zoltánné Kovács 03/05/1939 Lajosné Szabó 29/04/1934 András Bartos 13/04/1941 József Vastag 10/06/1931 Ferenc Zoltánné Finta 09/12/1947 Józsefné Jani 31/03/1953 Erzsébet Csaba 22/09/1935 Gyuláné Kovács 16/05/1968 István Gulyás 11/01/1937 Gábor Babodi 29/11/1946 Szilvia Kovács 03/03/1979 Roland Kovács 14/06/1990 Ferencné Kiss 26/06/1942 Ibolya Bakosné Kiss 31/05/1961 Ferenc József Kiss 14/01/1964 Viktor Kovács 04/09/1986 Roland Kovács 06/12/1993 Csilla Nyerges 17/11/1974 Attila Szabó 29/07/1954         Deceased applicants   András Kovács b:17/02/1951 d:14/02/2016 Pursued by heirs Mónika Kovács 28/09/1978 Szilvia Kovács 06/07/1951     József Róbert Kovács b:02/09/1959 d:19/09/2016 Pursued by heirs Roland Kovács 06/12/1993 Viktor Kovács 04/09/1986   Lászlóné Nyerges b:02/01/1939 d:27/04/2016 Pursued by heir Csilla Nyerges 17/11/1974   Czirmes György Budapest 01/02/2019 13/07/2018 6,800   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.