CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 24 octobre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6F7FC1B9 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF7147D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:5pt } .s2B9564AE { height:7.05pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 1235/18 Aleksandr Petrovich YAMASHKIN against Russia and 17 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 24   October 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention during transport. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention (see appended table). They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three ‑ month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 November 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]     1235/18 09/12/2017 Aleksandr Petrovich Yamashkin 11/02/1979 Tolmacheva Mariya Valeryevna Saransk Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Ruzaevskiy District Court of the Mordovia Republic, 16/06/2017. 11/06/2018 27/07/2018 1,500     4090/18 25/12/2017 Dmitriy Romanovich Filippov 25/04/1994       19/09/2018 14/11/2018 1,000     7608/18 28/12/2017 Elvin Khikmet ogly Dzhabbarov 09/05/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport.   19/09/2018 27/11/2018 1,000     8412/18 26/12/2017 Sergey Pavlovich Malyanov 08/12/1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 19/09/2018 27/11/2018 1,000     8816/18 09/01/2018 Mikhail Vladimirovich Abramov 19/06/1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 19/09/2018 12/11/2018 1,000     10871/18 12/02/2018 Mikhail Borisovich Konstantinov 20/04/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 19/09/2018 16/11/2018 1,000     11573/18 31/01/2018 Orif Tolibovich Ismailov 12/06/1989 Sayfiyev Shakhzod Sadriddin ugli St Petersburg   26/09/2018 21/01/2019 1,000     11992/18 19/02/2018 Konstantin Vadimovich Malivanchuk 08/09/1996       19/09/2018 02/01/2019 1,000     18974/18 08/04/2018 Sayasat Saday Ogly Agayev 27/07/1980 Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 09/10/2018 22/11/2018 1,000   18979/18 05/04/2018 Stepan Olegovich Tarasov 30/11/1974 Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 09/10/2018 22/11/2018 1,000   30320/18 02/07/2018 Denis Aleksandrovich Karakov 27/01/1982 Yesina Tatyana Robertovna Sevastopol Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 05/02/2019 10/04/2019 1,000   31081/18 14/06/2018 Nikita Borisovich Myasnikov 20/02/1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 29/01/2019 18/03/2019 1,000   31402/18 04/06/2018 Artem Andreyevich Golub 05/07/1992       29/01/2019 27/03/2019 1,000   31539/18 22/06/2018 Roman Nikolayevich Gromov 27/09/1976     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 29/01/2019 04/04/2019 1,000   31567/18 18/06/2018 Maksim Viktorovich Lysenko 22/04/1979     Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Primorskiy District Court of St Petersburg in a number of hearings with the most recent on 19/12/2017;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport and the applicant’s placement in a metal cage during court hearings. 29/01/2019 14/03/2019 4,000   31721/18 12/06/2018 Yuriy Petrovich Chukhray 26/02/1958     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 29/01/2019 21/03/2019 1,000   32296/18 25/06/2018 Salman Akhmedovich Khaybulayev 17/03/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 29/01/2019 18/03/2019 1,000   35946/18 09/07/2018 Sergey Vladimirovich Andreyev 13/08/1994     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport. 29/01/2019 26/04/2019 1,000   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.