CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 24 octobre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6F7FC1B9 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 20241/18 Aleksandr Fedorovich BURIK against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 24   October 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 27   December 2017, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table. The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention, concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport on several occasions listed in the appended table, as well as a complaint under Article 13 concerning the absence of an effective remedy to complain about poor conditions of transport, were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). Subsequently, it became clear that similar complaints by the same applicant under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the same occasions of transport had been communicated to the Government in the scope of the examination of application no. 6589/18. That application was settled by the parties following a unilateral declaration by the Government which was accepted by the applicant. On 4 April 2019 the Court struck application no. 6589/18 out of its list of cases on the basis of the friendly settlement reached by the parties. THE LAW In view of the above, the Court considers that the complaints in the present case have already been dealt with through the settlement in application no. 6589/16. It follows that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article   37 §   1   (b) of the Convention and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application under Article   37   §   1 in fine . Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 November 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Means of transport Start and end date Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law 20241/18 27/12/2017 Aleksandr Fedorovich Burik 23/06/1976 Van 20/10/2017 to 20/10/2017   train 20/10/2017 to 21/10/2017     van, train 26/11/2017 to 27/11/2017 0.2 m²       0.4 m²         0.4 m²     overcrowding, had to stand during transfer       insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no   or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet     no or restricted access to toilet, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient natural light, insufficient number of sleeping places   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of transport