CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 24 octobre 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024DEC003213509
- Date
- 24 octobre 2019
- Publication
- 24 octobre 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6F88BEDC { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE330DFD7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .s56EAFD9F { width:153.43pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 32135/09 Igor Pavlovych KOSYAN against Ukraine   The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 24   October 2019 as a Committee composed of:   André Potocki, President,   Ganna Yudkivska,   Yonko Grozev, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 2   June 2009, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Igor Pavlovych Kosyan, was born in 1968 and lives in Mykhaylivka-Rubezhivka, Kyiv region. The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.1 to the Convention, concerning the absence of the applicant and his representatives at the hearing before the Kyiv Regional Court of Appeal on 26 February 2008, were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. By letter dated 14 March 2019, sent by registered post, the applicant was requested to appoint a representative in accordance with Rule 36 § 4   (a) of the Rules of Court. According to the postal tracking service, the letter arrived to the point of destination on 28   March 2019. No reply followed from the applicant. By letter dated 19 July 2019, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for appointing a representative   had expired on 11 April 2019 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. According to the postal tracking service, the letter arrived to the point of destination on 31 July 2019. To date, no response has been received from the applicant. The Registry has also tried to contact the applicant on his mobile phone, however, without success. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicant does not wish to pursue the application within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 November 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   André Potocki   Acting Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 24 octobre 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024DEC003213509
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral