CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 28 novembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sD407E162 { width:116.42pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s9C3E97BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 38988/18 Ferenc VARSÁNYI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 28   November 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 19 December 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [i]     38988/18 30/07/2018 Ferenc VARSÁNYI 02/09/1973 Baráth Lívia Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - There is no effective remedy against protraction of civil proceedings. 24/10/2019 15/10/2019 7,800     40048/18 17/08/2018 Sándor MAGOSI 12/08/1963 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - There is no effective remedy against protraction of civil proceedings. 11/02/2019 28/10/2019 11,000     40051/18 17/08/2018 Sándorné MAGOSI 27/07/1944 Sándor MAGOSI 11/09/1939 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - There is no effective remedy against protraction of civil proceedings. 11/02/2019 28/10/2019 11,000     20705/19 02/04/2019 Cecília SZAK 25/08/1956     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - There is no effective remedy against protraction of civil proceedings. 31/10/2019 15/10/2019 11,700     21110/19 09/04/2019 Győző MISKOVITS 10/04/1953       10/10/2019 08/10/2019 14,300     25596/19 02/05/2019 (4 applicants) Household Ágnes JOÓ-CSOKONAI 31/05/1980 Ágnes SZABÓ 22/11/2006     Household Béla SZABÓ 08/11/1953 Erzsébet SZABÓNÉ IGAZ 14/05/1953 Horváth György Budapest   03/10/2019 18/10/2019 2,600     31354/19 29/05/2019 Mária JOHANN 06/12/1938       18/10/2019 15/10/2019 1,000     33871/19 18/06/2019   DR. NAGY ÜGYVÉDI IRODA 05/06/2001 Horváthné Nagy Ildikó Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - There is no effective remedy against protraction of civil proceedings. 28/10/2019 09/10/2019 3,900     38970/19 15/07/2019 Éva FUNK 24/09/1974 Hantos Ádám Budapest   24/10/2019 15/10/2019 2,600   39219/19 17/07/2019 (3 applicants) Csaba Tibor SZÉKELY 14/11/1957 Jenő RUSZTHI 27/07/1945 Judit KŐSZEGINÉ HUGYECZ 13/12/1951 Kecskés Ákos Zoltán Hódmezővásárhely Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - There is no effective remedy against protraction of civil proceedings. 28/10/2019 14/10/2019 6,500   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.