CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 13 février 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s490D418E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sD407E162 { width:116.42pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34025/15 Zakaria Ismail LACHINE against Romania and 12 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 13   February 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations or of certain requested information had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37 §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 5 March 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter Time-limit for submission by the applicant of the information requested     34025/15 23/07/2015 Zakaria Ismail LACHINE 20/05/1963     05/11/2019 12/11/2019 17/12/2019     46119/15 17/03/2016 Ioan MARARU 25/12/1989 Ioana-Gabriela Cicoșel Roznov 05/11/2019 12/11/2019 17/12/2019     50003/15 23/12/2015 Mircea-Gheorghe CONDOR 26/03/1971 Camelia Gabriela Szekely Satu Mare 25/09/2019 02/10/2019 06/11/2019     61531/15 08/03/2016 Paris FERARU 13/05/1964     05/11/2019 13/11/2019 17/12/2019     7514/16 11/03/2016 Teodor BOCA 19/09/1961     05/11/2019 12/11/2019 17/12/2019     8210/16 14/03/2016 Adrian-Gabriel CĂTRUNĂ 06/11/1986     05/11/2019 12/11/2019 17/12/2019     9881/16 03/03/2016 Vidor PUCZI-COZAK 01/10/1975     05/11/2019 12/11/2019 17/12/2019     14166/16 06/07/2016 Sebastian-Gheorghe BRAIȚ 20/07/1979     25/09/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 16/10/2019 06/11/2019     16797/16 12/04/2016 Romeo VIJULIE 26/05/1980     05/11/2019 11/11/2019 17/12/2019   17018/16 19/04/2016 Valentin-Eugen ANCU 18/02/1977     04/11/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 21/11/2019 16/12/2019   20634/16 17/05/2016 Laurențiu-Valeriu BAICU 20/06/1980     21/11/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 09/12/2019 06/01/2020   23688/16 23/05/2016 Costel ŞTEFĂNESCU 23/03/1975     21/11/2019 Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 09/12/2019 06/01/2020   29625/16 16/06/2016 Silviu-Florin BORCA 17/12/1989     04/11/2019 Returned to the Court as “unknown recipient” on 19/11/2019 16/12/2019