CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 13 février 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s494F418E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s434D37A9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s26F67D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:3pt } .sA6BA4500 { height:35.1pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 71699/17 Anton Mikhaylovich KARPIN against Russia and 19 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 13   February 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 5 March 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]     71699/17 22/09/2017 Anton Mikhaylovich KARPIN 19/09/1991     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/04/2018 06/06/2018 4,285     77356/17 25/04/2018 Zelimkhan Abdullayevich EDALBIYEV 28/04/1971 Frolova Inessa Igorevna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/01/2019 03/04/2019 5,750     1430/18 24/11/2017 Andrey Mikhaylovich TIKHOMIROV 26/10/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 16/07/2018 03/10/2018 8,500     1510/18 04/12/2017 Rakhmon Ortigaliyevich SAYDAKHMETOV 19/04/1979       16/07/2018 30/11/2018 9,675     2253/18 09/12/2017 Igor Sergeyevich FOKIN 08/12/1998 Stasyuk Olga Andreyevna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 16/07/2018 03/10/2018 1,000     5692/18 20/12/2017 Yevgeniy Nikolayevich LUKYANCHENKO 10/07/1988       10/09/2018 26/10/2018 6,500     7220/18 05/12/2017 Vladislav Nikolayevich TSYMBALYUK 06/02/1984       16/07/2018 09/11/2018 5,750     8292/18 01/02/2018 Aleksey Sergeyevich MARKOV 09/12/1985       10/09/2018 26/10/2018 1,730     13137/18 30/05/2018 Yevgeniy Vladimirovich BABKIN 17/08/1990     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - 6 round trips from 15/01/2018 to 03/04/2018 09/01/2019 01/04/2019 2,000   16184/18 12/03/2018 Anton Yevgenyevich YEVDOKIMOV 18/08/1977 Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 09/01/2019 21/03/2019 9,900   16196/18 12/03/2018 Andrey Vadimovich SHEPOVALOV 28/06/1971 Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 09/01/2019 21/03/2019 2,200   16936/18 16/03/2018 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich LARYUKIN 22/05/1977 Yezhov Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Velikiy Novgorod Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 04/10/2018 06/09/2019 13,500   17130/18 30/03/2018 Boris Arkadyevich KOGAN 21/12/1981 Gorodinskaya Inna Konstantinovna St Petersburg   09/01/2019 02/04/2019 4,950   23031/18 28/04/2018 Samer Makhmud FRUNZE 24/04/1997       30/10/2018 14/01/2019 5,900   24778/18 14/06/2018 Nodirzhon Abdumanonovich GULMIRZOYEV 30/05/1986 Frolova Inessa Igorevna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 25/01/2019 23/03/2019 9,500   26029/18 18/05/2018 Ivan Ivanovich SIBIRTSEV 10/01/1990     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 16/01/2019 20/03/2019 6,000   26757/18 12/03/2018 Khayreddini Radzhabek KHOMIDZODA 09/09/1994 Konakov Andrey Pavlovich St Petersburg   16/01/2019 08/04/2019 9,000   27626/18 18/05/2018 Aleksandr Vladimirovich GORBACHEV 12/01/1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 09/01/2019 23/03/2019 4,725   27899/18 26/05/2018 Igor Andreyevich ORLOV 25/09/1982 Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 16/01/2019 26/03/2019 5,250   28497/18 06/06/2018 Aleksandr Vladimirovich SEVBO 27/12/1982 Potkin Vladimir Yevgenyevich Arkhangelsk Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van and train; from a correctional colony in St Petersburg to a correctional colony in Arkhangelsk; between 28/03/2018 and 21/04/2018; overcrowding; lack of electric and natural light; lack of fresh air; lack of seatbelts and handrails during transportation. 16/01/2019 26/03/2019 4,920   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.