CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 30 avril 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9E6BC58A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:7pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s94C6321B { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD7AA71C8 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 37147/17 Yevgeniy Gennadyevich DEGTYAREV against Russia and 42 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 30   April 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications insofar as they are covered by the friendly settlement. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and other complaints under the well-established case-law, as covered by the unilateral declarations and described in the appended table. The applicant in application no. 45115/17 also complained about another period of his detention in poor conditions. The Court has examined those complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles   34 and   35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of application no. 45115/17 must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law and covered by the Government’s unilateral declarations (see the appended table); Declares the remainder of application no. 45115/17 inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 4 June 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     37147/17 10/05/2017 Yevgeniy Gennadyevich DEGTYAREV 08/05/1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 07/02/2020 5,400     42875/17 26/05/2017 Ivan Aleksandrovich STEPANOV 26/02/1978   Ravil Yuryevich MUKHAMEDGALIYEV 24/01/1972     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 16/12/2019 06/02/2020 7,875     45115/17 03/08/2017 Aleksandr Georgiyevich POZDERKE 05/09/1980     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 10/01/2020 7,650     48379/17 14/08/2017 Oleg Viktorovich TRETYAKOV 25/04/1979     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 05/02/2020 9,000     67363/17 16/08/2017 Viktor Ivanovich YAKOTSUTS 06/08/1977     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 09/01/2020 4,500     74009/17 22/01/2018 Pavel Yuryevich IGNATYEV 01/03/1981   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 31/10/2019 09/01/2020 7,200     75856/17 14/10/2017 Yevgeniy Vladimirovich INYAKIN 07/12/1982       16/12/2019 06/02/2020 9,000     78205/17 30/10/2017 Ruslan Valentinovich CHERKASOV 13/09/1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 09/01/2020 4,500     80404/17 01/11/2017 Sergey Sergeyevich DZHUN 27/05/1987     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 31/01/2020 11,700   6364/18 10/03/2018 Ivan Aleksandrovich DOROKHOV 18/05/1976     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 03/02/2020 4,950   16360/18 11/05/2018 Denis Vladimirovich GORBUNOV 12/03/1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 31/10/2019 29/11/2019 6,525   21533/18 11/04/2018 Nikolay Alekseyevich MAMONTOV 05/10/1978 Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich Pechora Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 31/10/2019 13/12/2019 8,100   21534/18 11/04/2018 Yevgeniy Yuryevich KOTRUTSA 26/09/1988 Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich Pechora Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 31/10/2019 13/12/2019 5,625   22418/18 04/04/2018 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich GRIBTSOV 15/03/1978       25/01/2019 25/03/2019 4,500   23216/18 20/04/2018 Aleksandr Vladimirovich TROPIN 30/06/1987     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 25/01/2019 21/03/2019 4,500   27709/18 22/05/2018 Sergey Ivanovich SOKOLENKO 14/08/1986   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 31/10/2019 09/01/2020 4,500   27837/18 29/05/2018 Viktor Sergeyevich SPIRIN 17/10/1989     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 14/01/2019 18/03/2019 4,500   28071/18 05/06/2018 Aleksey Aleksandrovich OSIPOV 23/06/1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 25/01/2019 21/03/2019 5,500   28710/18 08/06/2018 Rinat Nurislamovich KARIMOV 17/07/1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 31/10/2019 18/12/2019 5,175   31770/18 22/06/2018 Roman Yuryevich SVERCHKOV 01/02/1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 31/10/2019 13/12/2019 5,400   42720/18 08/01/2019 Konstantin Anatolyevich SHOKHIN 03/06/1986     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 10/12/2019 4,500   43008/18 12/11/2018 Denis Vladimirovich BUDYLIN 04/01/1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 21/11/2019 5,960   47365/18 21/09/2018 Andrey Valeryevich MIKHAYLOV 01/02/1983 Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich Pechora Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport on 2 occasions (round trip to the hospital) on 09/06/2018 and 21/06/2018; by van and train, 0.3   sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet 15/10/2019 03/12/2019 5,750   49310/18 08/10/2018 Aleksandr Sergeyevich DUBENSKIY 07/12/1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 03/12/2019 6,750   50325/18 08/10/2018 Oleg Nikolayevich KLAPOUSHENKO 15/08/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport –from 11/05/2018 to 31/07/2018; by train, 0.3 sq. m of personal space, overcrowding 15/10/2019 16/12/2019 6,500   50673/18 12/10/2018 Yevgeniy Andreyevich TKACHENKO 07/02/1989     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 25/11/2019 4,500   51500/18 18/10/2018 Artem Sergeyevich RUSINOV 22/01/1987     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 04/12/2019 4,500   52610/18 11/10/2018 Aleksey Borisovich RYZHOV 30/07/1968     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport on 18-19/06/2018; by van and train, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to toilet 15/10/2019 10/12/2019 5,500   57705/18 07/11/2018 Sergey Vasilyevich IZYUROV 09/11/1977     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 04/12/2019 5,500   57748/18 18/11/2018 Vitaliy Rudolfovich GASPERT 30/07/1974 Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport on 19/05/2018; by van and train from the detention facility to the prison hospital, 0.4 sq. m of personal space, overnight trip, restricted access to toilet, absence of an individual sleeping place 15/10/2019 16/12/2019 5,500   3855/19 28/11/2018 Gadzhimurad Tadzhidinovich RAMAZANOV 10/10/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 29/11/2019 4,500   5032/19 21/01/2019 Mikhail Vladimirovich VAKHNIN 17/02/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 05/12/2019 4,500   5878/19 29/12/2018 Roman Sergeyevich SHANGAREYEV 24/02/1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport on 07/12/2018; by train 15/10/2019 20/11/2019 7,000   6159/19 17/12/2018 Denis Andreyevich BOYKO 28/05/1993       15/10/2019 04/12/2019 4,500   6422/19 11/01/2019 Sergey Dmitriyevich ORLOV 05/01/1995     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 20/11/2019 4,500   11467/19 25/01/2019 Anton Yuryevich DYATKINSKIY 28/06/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 16/12/2019 07/02/2020 4,500   13447/19 21/02/2019 Ruslan Dzhamal ogly ALIYEV 03/08/1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 25/11/2019 4,500   13972/19 18/02/2019 Grigoriy Vadimovich SEREBROV 27/02/1996     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport on 15–16/02/2019; by van and train, inadequate temperature, insufficient personal space, overnight trip, no sleeping place, lack of fresh air, no potable water, restricted access to toilets 15/10/2019 03/12/2019 5,950   14183/19 11/02/2019 Ivan Andreyevich KRUGLOV 28/01/1985 Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 19/11/2019 5,963   21980/19 01/04/2019 Andrey Mikhaylovich LAZAREV 11/01/1982 Matskevich Sergey Viktorovich St Petersbourg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 09/01/2020 4,500   23454/19 01/04/2019 Aleksandr Gennadyevich VINOKUROV 06/07/1983     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 10/12/2019 5,175   24774/19 22/04/2019 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich TERENTYEV 18/05/1987 Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 15/10/2019 16/12/2019 4,500   27770/19 14/05/2019 Artem Sergeyevich STREMEDLOVSKIY 18/12/1988       15/10/2019 20/11/2019 4,500   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.