CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 mai 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9E6BC58A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:7pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s94C6321B { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD7AA71C8 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s868B1AA5 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:21.3pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s92808287 { width:178.32pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sB62BA9AD { width:168.28pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 1483/18 Vladimir Ivanovich GLAZKOV against Russia and 32 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 14   May   2020 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 4 June 2020. { Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     1483/18 08/12/2017 Vladimir Ivanovich GLAZKOV 21/08/1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 03/12/2019 26/02/2020 5,850     12051/18 14/02/2018 Andrey Nikolayevich BIRYUKOV 26/04/1971     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 15/01/2020 27/02/2020 9,225     32531/18 26/06/2018 Vladimir Yuryevich CHEKULDAYEV 30/03/1977     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport from 11/02/2018 to 25/02/2018; van, train; 0.4 to 0.6 sq.m of personal space, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to toilet. 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 6,400     32902/18 07/08/2018 Elkhan Kurban ogly MAMEDOV 10/03/1968       21/01/2020 14/02/2020 6,525     33014/18 26/06/2018 Vadim Yuryevich ANKUDINOV 21/05/1986 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 4,950     33150/18 01/07/2018 Sergey Alekseyevich ANISIMOV 19/12/1992     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 14/01/2020 05/03/2020 7,200     33446/18 29/06/2018 Viktor Vladimirovich AKSENOV 23/10/1987       21/01/2020 24/02/2020 5,625     33655/18 19/06/2018 Aleksey Ivanovich TSYBULSKIY 10/11/1956 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil   21/01/2020 26/02/2020 8,100     33879/18 06/07/2018 Aleksandr Anatolyevich MALETA 21/02/1976     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 14/01/2020 24/02/2020 4,500   34104/18 02/07/2018 Konstantin Aleksandrovich SKOSYRSKIKH 23/01/1980     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 27/02/2020 5,625   37700/18 26/07/2018 Konstantin Sergeyevich KHLAMOV 18/06/1986 Uvarov Aleksandr Leonidovich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 02/03/2020 5,400   37898/18 25/07/2018 Vladimir Aleksandrovich PETROV 12/07/1988 Uvarov Aleksandr Leonidovich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 02/03/2020 4,950   40275/18 05/10/2018 Dmitriy Rushanovich AYUKAYEV 19/02/1980       21/01/2020 12/02/2020 5,175   40286/18 26/10/2018 Sergey Nikolayevich BUKHTIYAROV 13/06/1972     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 02/03/2020 5,625   41345/18 17/08/2018 Sergey Borisovich KUTNYUK 31/05/1969 Yesina Tatyana Robertovna Sevastopol Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 28/02/2020 5,850   41874/18 26/09/2018 Mikhail Nikolayevich KUZMIN 01/01/1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 14/01/2020 03/03/2020 6,300   48959/18 12/11/2018 Aleksey Vladimirovich ANTONOV 20/12/1993     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 14/01/2020 03/03/2020 6,075   49984/18 09/10/2018 Aleksandr Valeryevich VORONETSKIY 11/11/1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 14/01/2020 03/03/2020 5,625   51159/18 17/10/2018 Viktor Vladimirovich SHAYERMAN 20/07/1977 Uvarov Aleksandr Leonidovich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 02/03/2020 5,175   52753/18 12/01/2019 Ilya Igorevich ORLOV 11/07/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 28/02/2020 5,625   54272/18 29/10/2018 Stepan Valeryevich KOSOVAN 05/04/1989     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 23/01/2020 27/02/2020 5,175   56124/18 23/04/2019 Danil Vladimirovich NOVOSELTSEV 19/10/1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 15/10/2019 19/02/2020 6,500   59581/18 04/12/2018 Aleksandr Anatolyevich SHELUDKO 28/09/1970     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 14/02/2020 4,500   1384/19 07/12/2018 Sergey Viktorovich BALAKIN 20/10/1984 Bayanova Olga Sergeyevna Severouralsk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 24/02/2020 4,500   3217/19 30/11/2018 Sergey Valeryevich KOKOVIKHIN 15/02/1979 Bayanova Olga Sergeyevna Severouralsk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 27/02/2020 4,500   4217/19 05/12/2018 Sergey Pavlovich LANTSOV 30/10/1983     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.   21/01/2020 03/03/2020 5,175   4411/19 22/11/2018 Andrey Yuryevich GLUKHOV 22/10/1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 24/02/2020 4,500   4740/19 06/01/2019 Anton Sergeyevich ZAKHAROV 06/08/1980 Chesnokov Aleksandr Yuryevich Kuminskiy Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 27/02/2020 4,500   8727/19 21/01/2019 Nikolay Aleksandrovich LUGOVSKOY 27/01/1976     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 14/01/2020 03/03/2020 6,300   12589/19 08/02/2019 Aleksandr Sergeyevich ISHCHENKO 01/09/1982 Chesnokov Aleksandr Yuryevich Kuminskiy Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 27/02/2020 4,500   14445/19 25/02/2019 Andrey Aleksandrovich PROLEYEV 25/01/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 27/02/2020 4,500   16401/19 11/03/2019 Andrey Anatolyevich DENGIN 23/05/1988 Chesnokov Aleksandr Yuryevich Kuminskiy Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 02/03/2020 4,500   23996/19 24/04/2019 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich DISKOV 07/06/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 21/01/2020 27/02/2020 4,500   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.