CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 mai 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9E6BC58A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:7pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5442DDD { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s9BC55665 { width:182.8pt; display:inline-block } .sE6546C2D { width:159.78pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 51671/17 Cătălin-Cristian COSTACHE against Portugal and 12 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 14   May 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Dmitry Dedov, President,   Alena Poláčková,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants’ details are set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Portuguese Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article   13 of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Portugal in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.   Liv Tigerstedt   Dmitry Dedov Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (Inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2]     51671/17 12/09/2017 Cătălin-Cristian Costache 05/05/1990 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 16/09/2019 9,000 1,200     65174/17 05/01/2018 Daniel Podasca 03/05/1988 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 23/09/2019 6,500 1,200     79148/17 11/01/2018 Ovidiu-Sorin Rusu 18/09/1983 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 23/09/2019 6,000 1,200     4937/18 05/03/2018 Tiago Salvador dos Santos Paias 31/08/1993 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest Art. 13 – lack of an effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 28/06/2019 16/09/2019 8,000 1,200     4938/18 04/06/2018 Luís Rafael Ferreira dos Santos 26/11/1980 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 16/09/2019 7,000 1,200     4943/18 05/03/2018 Humberto Roger da Silva Sá 01/07/1986 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 18/09/2019 7,000 1,200     21496/18 30/04/2018 João Carlos Brito 09/09/1981 Novakowski Yvonne Laurel Lisbon   28/06/2019 24/09/2019 2,000 1,200     27268/18 04/06/2018 Robert Alexandru Ciucă 11/10/1978 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 19/09/2019 7,000 1,200     29197/18 12/06/2018 Marcel Ovidiu Culea 05/02/1987 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 19/09/2019 5,000 1,200   30806/18 29/08/2018 Dorel Stan 25/07/1984 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 26/09/2019 12,500 1,200   31626/18 26/06/2018 Dumitru Tanu 20/09/1993 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 19/09/2019 6,000 1,200   46834/18 24/09/2018 Costel-Lucian Talpău 28/11/1985 Peter Irina Maria Bucharest   28/06/2019 19/09/2019 7,000 1,200   52771/18 29/10/2018 Khalid Hamdane 09/12/1969 Carreto Vitor Torres Vedras Art. 13 – lack of an effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 28/06/2019 04/09/2019 10,000 1,200   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.