CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 28 mai 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9E6BC58A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:7pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s94C6321B { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD7AA71C8 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF06D3D4E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sCBBE263B { height:29.8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 46031/17 Azamat Valeryevich IKAYEV against Russia and 28 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 28   May   2020 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 June 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     46031/17 15/06/2017 Azamat Valeryevich IKAYEV 28/01/1980       15/01/2020 27/02/2020 10,800     67817/17 02/04/2018 Nikolay Vladimirovich SYCHEV 06/02/1983     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 24/01/2020 5,850     80498/17 11/11/2017 Andrey Gennadyevich SOKOLOV 12/03/1980     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 18/02/2020 03/04/2020 9,900     9091/18 04/02/2018 Aleksandr Anatolyevich PASTUSHKOV 28/08/1974     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 18/02/2020 27/03/2020 9,450     12320/18 06/05/2018 Andrey Anatolyevich STEPANOV 28/11/1975     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention from 28/02/2018 to 28/04/2018; IZ-1 Chita; less than 3 sq. m of personal space; lack of fresh air; lack of natural light; constant electric light; poor quality of food; poor quality of bedding 03/12/2019 28/01/2020 5,865     25503/18 14/05/2018 Sergey Vasilyevich ABRAMUSHKIN 13/09/1971     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 21/01/2020 6,750     29454/18 05/06/2018 Vitaliy Sergeyevich VOROZHBIT 25/02/1988       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/12/2019 24/02/2020 6,525     29903/18 30/07/2018 Aleksey Leonidovich IVANOV 28/04/1980     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 14/01/2020 21/02/2020 5,625     32459/18 06/09/2018 Aleksandr Sergeyevich PENK 25/12/1973     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 14/01/2020 26/02/2020 7,200   41382/18 20/08/2018 Eduard Mikhaylovich PASHKEVICH 13/07/1977 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 5,850   41869/18 21/01/2019 Ivan Sergeyevich SPITSKIY 30/12/1991     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 14/01/2020 26/02/2020 6,525   42499/18 26/08/2018 Vadim Viktorovich BELYAYEV 05/10/1970 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 5,625   42971/18 26/08/2018 Anatoliy Petrovich ADYAKIN 12/02/1967 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 4,725   43105/18 27/08/2018 Anatoliy Aleksandrovich BOROVKOV 19/01/1958 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 8,100   47382/18 17/11/2018 Nikolay Vladimirovich RUSOV 26/04/1989     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 5,175   47809/18 27/09/2018 Yevgeniy Alekseyevich ZYKOV 31/12/1982 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 5,625   47816/18 28/09/2018 Vitaliy Olegovich ZASHCHIKHIN 28/10/1993 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 4,500   48117/18 30/09/2018 Ivan Valentinovich KLESHCHEV 06/02/1972 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 4,725   48745/18 23/07/2018 Denis Vladislavovich ZYRYANTSEV 13/11/1988     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 4,500   49325/18 01/10/2018 Aleksandr Vadimovich KOSTIN 26/05/1956 Kozhevnikova Yelena Zafirovna Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 5,400   50740/18 09/10/2018 Nikolay Andreyevich PASYNKOV 26/06/1997 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 5,625   53910/18 28/10/2018 Dmitriy Mikhaylovich BREGMAN 11/05/1976 Kozhevnikova Yelena Zafirovna Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 26/02/2020 5,400   57920/18 24/11/2018 Igor Yevgenyevich KOSYKH 12/03/1973     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 28/02/2020 4,500   58516/18 28/11/2018 Ivan Yevgenyevich SOKOLOV 03/03/1992     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 27/02/2020 4,500   4678/19 06/01/2019 Artem Yevgenyevich SAZONOV 30/10/1989     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 03/03/2020 4,500   5911/19 26/04/2019 Yevgeniy Yevgenyevich DAVLYATSHIN 03/12/1973     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 03/03/2020 4,500   7221/19 15/03/2019 Andrey Nikolayevich PONOMAREV 24/03/1976     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 27/02/2020 4,500   8731/19 19/01/2019 Viktor Nikolayevich OVCHINNIKOV 01/03/1976     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 14/01/2020 03/03/2020 4,500   25004/19 12/04/2019 Yuriy Nikolayevich OSMININ 17/03/1990     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 21/01/2020 02/03/2020 4,500   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.