CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG25
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 16 juin 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC000971720
- Date
- 16 juin 2020
- Publication
- 16 juin 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s490D418E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s21B1FE17 { width:12.67pt; display:inline-block } .sC38D9B28 { width:156.85pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s2753FA3F { width:163.53pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 9717/20 LATVIA against Denmark   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 16 June 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Aleš Pejchal, President,   Pauliine Koskelo,   Tim Eicke, judges, and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 February 2020, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The case originated in an application (no. 9717/20) against the Kingdom of Denmark lodged with the Court under Article 33 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the Republic of Latvia on 19 February 2020. The Latvian Government (“the applicant Government”) were represented by their Agent Kristine Līce. The Danish Government (“the respondent Government”) were represented before the Court by their Agent, Mr Michael Braad, and their Co-Agent, Mrs Nina Holst-Christensen. The applicant Government complained that it would be in breach of Articles 3, 5 and 8 of the Convention if the respondent Government were to extradite to South Africa the Latvian national, Ms Misane, who at the relevant time was detained in Denmark. The respondent Government was given notice of the application on 19   February 2020. On 13 March 2020, the applicant Government informed the Court that the case had been resolved in that Ms Misane had been returned by the respondent Government to Latvia on 3 March 2020. Accordingly, the applicant Government requested that the Court strike out the application pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the Convention. The President of the Court assigned the case to Section I. The President of that Section decided, under Rules 31 and 51 of the Rules of Court, that the case could be examined by a Committee composed within Section I, without participation of the national judges. None of the parties objected thereto. THE LAW In the light of the above, the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article   37 §   1   (b) of the Convention and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue the examination of the application under Article   37   §   1 in fine . Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 9 July 2020.   Renata Degener   Aleš Pejchal   Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Date
- 16 juin 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC000971720
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral