CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 juillet 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9E6BC58A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:7pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s94C6321B { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s12CB6876 { margin-left:28.6pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.6pt; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sDAD2B73A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:28.6pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.6pt; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA2548810 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s718D1C37 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD7AA71C8 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .s44F1B782 { width:167.34pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s6B02B696 { width:159.34pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s39109D2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 41102/16 Aleksey Anatolyevich BELYAYEV against Russia and 29 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 9   July   2020 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the observations submitted by the parties, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints under Article 13 of the Convention about absence of domestic remedies in Russia to complain about poor conditions of detention were also communicated to the Government. THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. Complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) and under Article 13 of the Convention (lack of an effective remedy for conditions of detention) In the present applications, the applicants complained of conditions of their detention in violation of the national requirements during periods which had already come to an end (for further details see the attached table). They also argued that they did not have an effective domestic remedy to complain about those conditions at the national level. Articles 3 and 13   read: Article 3 Prohibition of torture “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Article 13 Right to an effective remedy “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.” The Government submitted their observations, disputing the violations alleged. On 10 January 2020 the Government submitted additional information about the new Compensation Act and asked to treat it as a new remedy in respect of conditions of detention complaints under Articles 3   and 13 of the Convention. The applicants maintained their complaints. In its recent decision of Shmelev and Others v. Russia ((dec.), no.   41743/17 and 16 others, 17 March 2020), the Court has examined similar applications lodged by Russian applicants and declared them inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. In particular, the Court took into account that on 27   January 2020 the new Compensation Act entered into force in Russia. It noted that the Act provides that any detainee who alleges that his or her conditions of detention are in breach of national legislation or international agreements of the Russian Federation can apply to a court. The novelty of the Act is that the (former) detainee can claim, at the same time, a finding of a violation of inadequate detention conditions and financial compensation for such breach. In that decision, the Court further held as follows: “122.     The Court reiterates that, where the detention is over, a compensatory remedy can suffice to provide the applicants with fair redress for the alleged breach of Article 3 (see case-law cited above in paragraph 87). Accordingly, it is sufficient to examine whether the applicants concerned can be required to exhaust the compensatory remedy. 123.     As mentioned above, the Court may examine the effectiveness of a newly introduced domestic remedy even if it was not available at the time of lodging of applications, where such remedy is introduced at a later stage in response to the Court’s finding of a systemic problem (see paragraph   106 above and the case-law cited therein). 124.     The Court has concluded that the Compensation Act presents, in principle, an adequate and effective avenue for compensatory redress in cases raising issues of improper conditions of pre-trial detention. It has found that it is directly accessible to the persons concerned, is furnished with the requisite procedural guarantees associated with judicial adversarial proceedings, that there are no reasons to expect that such claims would not be processed within a reasonable time, or that the compensation would not be paid promptly. It also concluded that the system offers reasonable prospects of success to the applicants in terms of the compensation awards. 125.     The Compensation Act is equipped with transitional provisions, so that any person whose complaint about inadequate conditions of detention was pending with this Court at the time of the Act’s entry into force can apply within 180 days after that date (see paragraph 63 above). The same would apply to those whose complaints would be declared inadmissible by this Court in view of the Act coming into force. 126.     The Court accepts that the domestic courts have not yet been able to establish any practice under the Compensation Act. However, the Court has already found that doubts about the prospects of a remedy, which appears to offer a reasonable possibility of redress, are not a sufficient reason to eschew it (see Shtolts and Others , cited above, § 111). 127.     Accordingly, even though the domestic remedy was not available to the applicants at the time when they applied to the Court, the situation justifies a departure from the general rule on exhaustion and requires the applicants in question to seek compensation under the Compensation Act. 128.     The Court accepts that the outcome of the applicants’ claims under the new provisions cannot at present be ascertained. However, as the Court has already noted on similar occasions, it would remain open for the applicants to lodge fresh complaints should their claims to the domestic courts prove unsuccessful, for one reason or another. The Court’s ultimate supervisory jurisdiction remains in respect of any complaints lodged by the applicants who, in conformity with the principle of subsidiarity, have exhausted available avenues of redress (see Domján , §   37; and Shtolts and Others , §§   112-113, both decisions cited above). The Court will remain free to assess the compliance of application of the domestic practice with the pilot judgment and the Convention standards in general, summary of the relevant case-law in paragraph 82 above). 129.   Finally, the Court does not lose sight of a number of positive developments related to the situation with pre-trial detention in Russia that will be analysed below.” Having thus considered that there exists an effective remedy in Russia for cases where applicants complain about a breach of Article 3 in respect of past pre-trial detention, and having dismissed the applications by such applicants for non-exhaustion, the Court declared that it will apply that approach to all similar applications (see Shmelev and Others , (dec.)., cited above, § 130). The Court also found that applicants who complained about their detention in overcrowded conditions of post-conviction facilities in violation of the national statutory norm of two square metres per person, and where their detention in such conditions was already over, found themselves in a situation similar to that of persons whose past pre-trial detention had been in breach of the applicable national standards. The Court stressed that for them, as well as for other persons in similar situation, the new Compensatory Act presents, in principle, an adequate and effective avenue of obtaining compensatory redress, and offers reasonable prospects of success (see Shmelev and Others , (dec.)., cited above, § 154). It thus also rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies applications where applicants complained about post-conviction detention in violation of the national statutory standard and decided that actual or potential applicants finding themselves in a similar situation – i.e. where the complaint concerns past correctional detention in conditions in breach of the applicable domestic standards – are also expected to first make use of the compensatory remedy introduced in January 2020 ( Shmelev and Others , (dec.)., cited above, §§ 155-156). Turning to the circumstances of the present cases and having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility of these complaints. In particular, the Court observes that the majority of the applicants complained about the conditions of their detention in colony IK ‑ 56 in the Sverdlovsk Region. In addition to specific grievances listed in the table attached below, the applicants provided similar description of the general conditions. While not arguing that they lacked personal space as such, the applicants nevertheless complained about degrading treatment relating to the lack of water-supply and sewage systems in IK-56 colony, and the absence of proper sanitary installations in the cells. The treatment they complained of consisted of the necessity to relieve themselves in a bucket, often in the presence of another inmate, and to endure difficulties as a result of the lack of sanitary facilities, such as the unpleasant odour in the cells, poor hygiene and the daily obligation to empty and clean the bucket. Those conditions in IK-56 of the Sverdlovsk Region were already the subject of the Court’s criticism, when it held that the lack of access to proper sanitary facilities run counter to the guarantees of Article 3 of the Convention (see Gorbulya v. Russia , no. 31535/09, § 94, 6 March 2014). The Court in this respect does not lose sight of the parties’ submissions that the Russian authorities decided to close the facility and that by the summer 2018 all inmates were transferred from it. It is clear that the conditions in IK-56 colony ran counter to the domestic legal requirements. It thus follows that the applicants who complained about the conditions of their detention in IK-56 colony in Sverdlovsk Region were in the same position as applicants who complained about their detention in overcrowded conditions of post-conviction facilities in violation of the national statutory norm of two square metres per person (see Shmelev and Others , (dec.)., cited above, § 154). To sum up, the Court considers that in so far as the applicants have lodged prima facie well-founded complaints about breach of their rights by improper conditions of their detention, as described in the appended table, the Compensation Act affords them an opportunity to obtain compensatory redress. Accordingly, the applicants should exhaust this remedy before their complaints can be examined by the Court. It follows that their complaints, as listed in the appended table, under Articles 3 and 13 should be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 30 July 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m per inmate Number of toilets   per brigade Specific grievances     41102/16 25/08/2016 Aleksey Anatolyevich BELYAYEV 12/01/1979     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 21/02/2010 to 11/11/2017 7 year(s) and 8 month(s) and   22 day(s)   lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to running water, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, bad odour in the cell, lack of requisite medical assistance, passive smoking, frequent usage of handcuffs     11374/17 30/01/2017 Vitaliy Sergeyevich BOLSHAKOV 23/07/1992     SIZO-1 Moscow 30/10/2015 to 19/12/2016 1 year(s) and 1 month(s)   and 20 day(s)   IK-11 Nizhny Novgorod Region 19/12/2016 to 30/10/2021 4 year(s) and 10 month(s)   and 12 day(s)           128 inmate(s) 1.5 m² 6 toilet(s) overcrowding         overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food     75859/17 13/10/2017 Dmitriy Vladimirovich GOLUBEV 08/12/1972     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 21/02/2010 to 01/12/2017 7 year(s) and 9 month(s)   and 11 day(s)   lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to shower     76271/17 30/01/2018 Oleg Arsentyevich IVANOV 12/07/1974     IK-16 Murmansk Region 19/01/2014 to 27/01/2018 4 year(s) and 9 day(s) 90 inmate(s) <2 m² overcrowding, lack of or insufficient natural light, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to running water, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease     5453/18 27/12/2017 Petr Nikolayevich CHERKAS 08/10/1986     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 26/02/2010 to 18/10/2017 7 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 23 day(s)   overcrowding, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food     5503/18 29/12/2017 Pavel Vladimirovich SHESTAKOV 21/08/1978     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 14/11/2013 to 03/11/2017 3 year(s) and 11 month(s)   and 21 day(s)   no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, no or restricted access to shower     5674/18 13/12/2017 Vladimir Sergeyevich RYZHIKOV 15/02/1990     IK-11 Nizhniy Novgorod Region 10/06/2013 to 11/09/2017 4 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 2 day(s) <2 m² bunk beds, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no warm clothes     5873/18 20/12/2017 Sergey Viktorovich RUMYANTSEV 02/11/1954     IK-11 Nizhny Novgorod Region 22/12/2008 to 12/02/2020 11 year(s) and 2 month(s)   and 21 day(s) 135 inmate(s) 1.6 m² 8 toilet(s) no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of requisite medical assistance, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air     6144/18 25/12/2017 Aleksey Sergeyevich SHATALOV 18/03/1983     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 16/08/2013 to 11/11/2017 4 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 27 day(s)   lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, constant electric light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet   7305/18 27/12/2017 Aleksey Gennadyevich BERDUTO 02/02/1966     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 06/12/2013 to 03/02/2018 4 year(s) and 1 month(s)   and 29 day(s)   lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to running water, poor quality of potable water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities   7740/18 19/01/2018 Vladimir Viktorovich MIRGOROD 01/11/1979     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 27/08/2012 to 11/11/2017 5 year(s) and 2 month(s)   and 16 day(s)   lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light   9642/18 08/02/2018 Aleksey Vladimirovich KVASHNIN 30/09/1983     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 21/03/2010 to 05/01/2018 7 year(s) and 9 month(s)   and 16 day(s)   lack of plumbing, no sewage system, lack of privacy for toilet, no electrical light in toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, stench in the courtyard, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food     9661/18 11/11/2017 Sergey Anatolyevich KHURTAK 12/08/1985     OIK-40 IK-39 Krasnoyarsk Region 02/05/2017 to 29/12/2017 7 month(s) and 28 day(s) 130 inmate(s) 1.2 m² overcrowding   9841/18 10/02/2018 Vadim Vladislavovich GORBULYA 05/03/1973     IZ-47/1 St Petersburg 26/02/2017 to 16/08/2017 5 month(s) and 22 day(s)   IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 26/08/2017 to 01/02/2018 5 month(s) and 7 day(s)   overcrowding       lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to toilet   15234/18 12/03/2018 Islam Bekkhanovich YANDIYEV 23/12/1989     IK 56 Sverdlovsk Region 10/02/2015 to 17/12/2017 2 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 8 day(s)   lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food   17936/18 26/03/2018 Andrey Valeryevich POLICHEV 29/01/1988     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 06/12/2015 to 05/01/2018 2 year(s) and 1 month(s)   lack of sewage and water supply systems, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, unpleasant odour from the waste disposal, inadequate state of the exercise yard, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to running water, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food   20900/18 30/04/2018 Viktor Gennadyevich KHARINTSEV 27/09/1983     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 14/11/2009 to 18/01/2018 8 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 5 day(s)   lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient natural light   25994/18 14/05/2018 Artur Agasiyevich ZAKHARYAN 26/11/1962     IK-11 Nizhniy Novgorod Region 26/11/2015 to 28/04/2020 4 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 3 day(s) 1.7 m² lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, lack or inadequate furniture, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to toilet, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or insufficient disinfection of barbering and haircutting tools, small courtyard, lack of requisite medical assistance, overcrowding in the kitchen, poor quality of food   26772/18 23/05/2018 Aleksandr Anatolyevich OSIPOV 19/07/1977 Yesina Tatyana Robertovna Sevastopol IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 19/09/2014 to 01/07/2018 More than 3 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 21 day(s)   no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air   26795/18 18/05/2018 Ramil Gadzhimustafayevich IBRAGIMOV 28/12/1983     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 04/06/2010 to 19/02/2018 7 year(s) and 8 month(s)   and 16 day(s)   no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water   27846/18 21/05/2018 Aslan Bashirovich KUCHMENOV 19/02/1980     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 12/04/2016 to 19/01/2018 1 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 8 day(s)   lack of water supply, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of ventilation, lack of or insufficient natural light, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, poor conditions of walk courtyard, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of sanitation   30552/18 13/06/2018 Zufar Zakiyevich KULMUKHAMETOV 11/05/1983     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 14/02/2017 to 02/03/2018 1 year(s) and 17 day(s)   no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to potable water, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of potable water   31346/18 20/06/2018 Eduard Vilovich MIRONOV 03/08/1974     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 16/04/2016 to 10/02/2018 1 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 26 day(s)   no sewage system in the detention facility, no running water, the same facility as in the case of Gorbulya v. Russia (no. 31535/09, 6 March 2014)   32116/18 26/06/2018 Aleksandr Borisovich GORSHKOV 12/06/1986 Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kostroma IK-1 Kostroma Region 08/12/2017 to 05/06/2018 5 month(s) and 29 day(s) 100 inmate(s) 0.8 m² overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease   32359/18 22/06/2018 Ruslan Vladimirovich FEDOROV 26/08/1983     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 26/07/2017 to 03/03/2018 7 month(s) and 6 day(s)   lack of fresh air, passive smoking, constant electric light, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, cuffs, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to running water   33945/18 04/07/2018 Vadim Fedorovich POSTONOGOV 22/05/1988     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 13/07/2010 to 11/02/2018 7 year(s) and 6 month(s)   and 30 day(s)   no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to running water, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, poor quality of food   34233/18 06/07/2018 Vasiliy Valentinovich SATINOV 12/02/1979     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 04/04/2017 to 11/02/2018 10 month(s) and 8 day(s)   no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to running water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease   34458/18 09/07/2018 Yuriy Mykhaylovych PASKAL 18/03/1966     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 26/11/2017 to 03/02/2018 2 month(s) and 9 day(s)   no or restricted access to toilet, poor quality of potable water, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, no or restricted access to shower   34479/18 13/07/2018 Vasiliy Ivanovich KHOKHLOV 13/03/1969     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 04/06/2010 to 03/02/2018 7 year(s) and 8 month(s)   no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air   57957/18 30/11/2018 Issa Lokhanovich KHASHAGULGOV 11/01/1968     IK-56 Sverdlovsk Region 24/11/2014 to 06/07/2018 3 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 13 day(s)   no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to running water, small courtyard, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to shower, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease