CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 15 octobre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9E6BC58A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:7pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s94C6321B { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD7AA71C8 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sC6726222 { width:137.43pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF06D3D4E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 5489/19 Indira MUJKANOVIĆ against Bosnia and Herzegovina and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 15   October 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms H. Kapetan, a lawyer practising in Travnik. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions against the Zenica-Doboj Canton were communicated to the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Government”). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court has recently examined the leading case concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions against the Zenica-Doboj Canton (see Muhović and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), nos. 40841/13 and 12 others, 8 October 2020). Having noted that the Zenica-Doboj Canton had adopted an action plan, undertaking to enforce all decisions against it, in chronological order, by 2041, the Court found that the matter had been resolved. There is no reason to decide otherwise in the present case. In view of the above, the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article   37 §   1   (b) of the Convention and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the applications under Article   37   §   1 in fine . Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 5 November 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement of domestic decisions) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Relevant domestic decision     5489/19 11/01/2019 Indira MUJKANOVIĆ 02/03/1966 Municipal Court in Zenica, 15/01/2010   Municipal Court in Zenica, 22/08/2014   Municipal Court in Zenica, 09/10/2015       5509/19 11/01/2019 Elvedin BEVRNJA 02/11/1972 Municipal Court in Zenica, 11/02/2013       5524/19 11/01/2019 Zemira FAJKOVIĆ - ĐUVELEK 20/04/1967 Municipal Court in Zenica, 11/02/2013       5646/19 11/01/2019 Nermina ŠANTIĆ 16/01/1964 Municipal Court in Zenica, 16/04/2010   Municipal Court in Zenica, 19/11/2012       5650/19 11/01/2019 Rešid MUJIĆ 03/04/1982 Municipal Court in Zenica, 11/02/2013         7023/19 11/01/2019 Emir VALENTIĆ 04/09/1975 Municipal Court in Zenica, 15/01/2010   Municipal Court in Zenica, 22/08/2014   Municipal Court in Zenica, 09/10/2015       8112/19 18/01/2019 Melisa ŠEHIĆ 16/11/1971 Municipal Court in Zenica, 16/04/2010   Municipal Court in Zenica, 19/11/2012       8118/19 18/01/2019 Hanka HASANBEGOVIĆ 03/07/1949 Municipal Court in Zenica, 16/04/2010       32811/19 21/05/2019 Hanka HASANBEGOVIĆ 03/07/1949 Municipal Court in Zenica, 18/06/2013     37537/19 28/06/2019 Jasminka JAHIĆ 16/06/1962 Municipal Court in Zenica, 22/10/2009   Municipal Court in Zenica, 31/05/2016