CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 15 octobre 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015DEC002922606
- Date
- 15 octobre 2020
- Publication
- 15 octobre 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s490D418E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s838106AB { width:144.53pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 29226/06 Ilinca Viorica MAVRIANOPOL and Eugenia MAVRIANOPOL against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 15   October 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 12   July 2006, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants, Ms Ilinca Viorica Mavrianopol and Ms   Eugenia Mavrianopol, are Romanian nationals born in 1967 and 1941 respectively. They were represented by Mr V. Şerbănescu, a lawyer practising in Bucharest. The applicants’ complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning their inability to obtain restitution of their nationalised property or to secure compensation therefor were communicated to the Romanian Government. Subsequently, by a letter of 14 September 2020, the applicants informed the Court that they had received compensation for their property on the basis of Law no. 165/2013. Therefore, they submitted that they would like to pursue the current application only as regards their request for 10,000   euros (EUR) in respect of costs and expenses incurred in the proceedings before the domestic courts and the Court. THE LAW The Court notes that according to the available evidence in the case ‑ file, following the steps the applicants have taken at national level, they received compensation for the immovable property that forms the object of the present application. In the light of the above, the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention regarding the applicants’ complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see Ana Ionescu and Others v. Romania , nos. 19788/03 and 18   others, §§ 15-16, 26 February 2019) and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue the examination of the application under Article 37 § 1 in fine . Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list. As regards the applicants’ request for costs and expenses, the Court notes that it has not been substantiated by any documents. Accordingly, it rejects this claim. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases; Rejects the applicants’ claim for costs and expenses. Done in English and notified in writing on 5 November 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 15 octobre 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015DEC002922606
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral