CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 15 octobre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s490D418E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s838106AB { width:144.53pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s794E44E1 { height:6.85pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s352FB0A7 { height:17.25pt } .s15A4B0A7 { height:13.35pt } .s14C0077A { height:8.55pt } .s178DB0A7 { height:14.55pt } .s816FE78A { height:14.8pt } .s15C7B0A7 { height:13.65pt } .s1543B0A7 { height:13.25pt } .s266AE78A { height:13.6pt } .s34C6B0A7 { height:17.95pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34803/16 Vasile COEV against Romania and 15 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 15   October 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations or of certain requested information had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. All applicants, except it would seem the applicant in application no. 56607/16, have been released from prison.   THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 5 November 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter Time-limit for submission by the applicant of the information requested Date of the applicant’s release from prison     34803/16 30/06/2016 Vasile COEV 26/08/1987 30/06/2020 14/07/2020 Letter returned as “recipient moved” 11/08/2020 14/11/2017     36374/16 16/08/2016 Adrian ȘINCARU 19/08/1975 30/06/2020 20/07/2020 Signed by the applicant 11/08/2020 11/04/2018     40696/16 12/08/2016 Vasile-Cristinel BUTACU 15/11/1969 22/06/2020 10/07/2020 Illegible signature 03/08/2020 27/02/2018     41863/16 16/12/2016 Sorin-Daniel SIMA 26/05/1986 16/06/2020 29/06/2020 Letter returned as “recipient moved” 28/07/2020 19/03/2019     45650/16 02/09/2016 Dorin-Ionel CRĂCIUN 30/09/1986 25/06/2020 09/07/2020 Signed by the applicant’s mother 06/08/2020 01/10/2019     46420/16 29/08/2016 Claudiu-Petru SERDEAN 21/07/1978 25/06/2020 08/07/2020 Illegible signature 06/08/2020 21/11/2017     46421/16 14/09/2016 Dumitru TITILIA 29/09/1970 25/06/2020 06/07/2020 Illegible signature 06/08/2020 23/04/2019     46716/16 09/11/2016 Daniel BĂLAN 21/03/1982 25/06/2020 07/07/2020 Illegible signature 06/08/2020 17/04/2019     47697/16 16/09/2016 Petre-Cristian BRÎNZEA 04/11/1964 25/06/2020 15/07/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 06/08/2020 18/07/2018   56607/16 11/10/2016 Alexandru IONIŢĂ 24/08/1984 25/06/2020 13/07/2020 Letter returned from the home address (indicated as correspondence address in the application form) as “incomplete address” 06/08/2020 -   61547/16 16/01/2017 Gheorghe GĂVENEA 23/08/1968 25/06/2020 08/07/2020 Signed by the applicant’s mother 06/08/2020 06/02/2018   61551/16 21/03/2017 Costel IORDACHE 14/05/1986 25/06/2020 07/07/2020 Signed by the applicant’s mother 06/08/2020 19/10/2017   62086/16 28/11/2016 George Cristian ENE 05/07/1987 25/06/2020 03/07/2020 Signed by the applicant’s mother 06/08/2020 06/02/2018   62646/16 17/11/2016 Fănel CUMPĂNAȘU 12/11/1980 25/06/2020 06/07/2020 Signed by the applicant’s brother 06/08/2020 10/08/2018   62805/16 21/11/2016 Ionuț CASAPU 24/02/1981 25/06/2020 06/07/2020 Signed by the applicant’s brother 06/08/2020 11/06/2018   63078/16 23/11/2016 Lucian PETRE 21/11/1987 25/06/2020 03/07/2020 Illegible signature 06/08/2020 19/06/2019