CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 décembre 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1203DEC001592917
- Date
- 3 décembre 2020
- Publication
- 3 décembre 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s838106AB { width:144.53pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 15929/17 Daniel-Ștefan MARTIN against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 3   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 22   March 2017, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Daniel-Ștefan Martin, was born in 1991. The applicant’s complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the refusal of leave to prisoner for attending funeral of close relatives as well as under Article 3 concerning the inadequate conditions of detentions were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”) on 3   December 2019. The Government submitted observations on the admissibility and merits of the case. By letter of 3 December 2019, the applicant was informed that his case had been communicated to the Government. The letter was sent to Codlea Prison, indicated by the applicant as his correspondence address, but returned the Court with the mention that the applicant had been released on 13 February 2018. By regular letter dated 9 July 2020 the Government’s observations were forwarded to the address indicated on the applicant’s identity card as his home address and he was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter and there are no previous letters from the applicant informing the Court about a change of address. In fact he has not been in contact with the Court since he lodged his application with the Court in March 2017. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 January 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 3 décembre 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1203DEC001592917
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral