CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .s8D893B61 { width:152.77pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sA5D1F3C5 { margin-top:4pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 19322/18 Zoran STOJANOVIĆ and Others against Serbia (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 3   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Carlo Ranzoni, President,   Branko Lubarda,   Pauliine Koskelo, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 10   April 2018, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms J. Mihailović , a lawyer practising in Valjevo. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of administrative proceedings were communicated to the Serbian Government (“the Government”). THE LAW In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that for the reasons stated below, the complaints concerning the excessive length of the impugned administrative proceedings are inadmissible. The Court notes that the administrative proceedings started on 6   November 2009 when the applicants filed an appeal with the competent second-instance administrative body (see Počuča v. Croatia , no. 38550/02, §   30, 29 June 2006). It would appear that the proceedings are still pending almost 11 years later. However, the Court observes that as regards the period from 6 November 2009 to 26 October 2017, the applicants can no longer claim to be victims within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention since on the latter date the Constitutional Court expressly acknowledged the alleged breach and awarded the applicants 800 euros each in respect of non-pecuniary damage. Although that amount is lower than those awarded by the Court, the Court considers that it is still reasonable in view of the particular circumstance of this case, notably, the large number of applicants and the rather limited stakes involved in the case (see Sinđelić and Others v. Serbia (dec.), no.   7129/15, 29   August 2019). As regards the period after 26 October 2017, the applicants failed to exhaust all effective domestic remedies as required by Article   35   §§   1 of the Convention since they should complain again to the Constitutional Court about any further delays (see Becová v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 23788/06, 18   September 2007). In view of the above, the Court concludes that the application must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§   1, 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 January 2021.   Liv Tigerstedt   Carlo Ranzoni   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil and/or administrative proceedings) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction Relevant domestic decision Domestic award in respect of non-pecuniary damage (in euros) 19322/18 10/04/2018 (32 applicants) Zoran STOJANOVIĆ 1989 Goran ĐORĐEVIĆ 1966 Zoran LEPOVIĆ 1970 Zoran TANASKOVIĆ 1980 Darko VUKMIROVIĆ 1975 Srđan VUKOJIČIĆ 1976 Dejan STEFANOVIĆ 1983 Rade DIMITRIJEVIĆ 1969 Suzana GRBIĆ 1977 Slaviša VELIČKOVIĆ 1966 Milan NIKOLIĆ 1988 Aleksandar BEKČIĆ 1987 Slaviša ORLOVIĆ 1971 Radojko LUKOVIĆ 1973 Živoin RISTIĆ 1971 Slavko ZEČEVIĆ 1968 Branislav MITIĆ 1968 Bojan POPOVIĆ 1971 Jelena ŽIVKOVIĆ 1982 Ivan PREŠIĆ 1979 Aleksandar PETROVIĆ 1971 Slađan MATOVIĆ 1973 Miodrag KOJIĆ 1967 Spaso MLADENOVIĆ 1969 Saša ŽIVKOVIĆ 1977 Dejan RISTIĆ 1970 Novica JAKOVLJEVIĆ 1969 Dragan ŽIVKOVIĆ 1969 Petar PETROVIĆ 1970 Rakić VUKIĆ 1966 Slađan PANTIĆ 1969 Darko DUBOVAC 1968 06/11/2009   pending   More than 10 years and 11 months and 24 days   1 level of jurisdiction   Constitutional Court Už-2465/2016 26/10/2017   800 euros