CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s434D37A9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s838106AB { width:144.53pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s48941B3D { width:6.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4B29B0A7 { height:18.55pt } .sED2FFA7C { width:1.88pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 27455/16 Ionuț-Daniel SLĂVOIU against Romania and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 3   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. All applicants have been released from prison. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 January 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter Time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison       27455/16 13/06/2016 Ionuț-Daniel SLĂVOIU 1985 26/07/2018 19/08/2020 27082020 Illegible signature 30/09/2020 05/06/2018       30627/16 24/08/2016 Isidor MORARU 1960 05/10/2016 19/08/2020 25/08/2020 Illegible signature 30/09/2020 11/02/2019       37319/16 26/07/2016 Viorel-Constantin MATEI 1982 12/09/2016 17/07/2020 14/08/2020 Letter returned as ”unclaimed” 27/08/2020 17/07/2018       42679/16 14/12/2016 Alin-Vasile OANCEA 1977 Represented by Constantin-Alexandru Oancea, Șelimbãr 11/04/2017 19/08/2020 24/09/2020 Letter returned as recipient ”unknown” 30/09/2020 30/07/2019       44334/16 13/12/2016 Rudolf ALAFI 1988 14/02/2017 14/02/2020 24/02/2020 Letter returned as recipient “moved” 27/03/2020 07/11/2017       45188/16 22/08/2016 Marian MĂRĂȘESCU 1959 19/09/2016 19/08/2020 31/08/2020 Letter returned as “refused” 30/09/2020 16/10/2018       46209/16 13/10/2016 Florin-Gheorghe LANGAȘ 1985 10/01/2018 19/08/2020 10/09/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 30/09/2020 05/06/2018       48093/16 11/11/2016 Constantin-Carol MIHAI 1976 17/11/2016 20/07/2020 04/08/2020 Signed by the applicant’s wife 31/08/2020 21/12/2017       49668/16 25/10/2016 Marian CIREȘI 1989 20/02/2017 20/072020 05/08/2020 Illegible signature 31/08/2020 17/07/2018   51445/16 27/09/2016 Dragoș-Costel ROPOTĂ 1991 06/02/2017 19/08/2020 18/09/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed”   30/09/2020 21/08/2018   55131/16 10/01/2017 Adrian-Cornel COȚOVANU 1971 16/01/2017 17/07/2020 03/08/2020 Letter returned as recipient “moved” 27/08/2020 20/03/2018