CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9E6BC58A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:7pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s94C6321B { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD7AA71C8 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sA3A61D5F { width:158.44pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF7147D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:5pt } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 28524/10 Igor Konstantinovich SOTNIKOV against Russia and 34 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 3   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention (see the appended table). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 January 2021.   Liv Tigerstedt   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     28524/10 13/04/2010 Igor Konstantinovich SOTNIKOV 1968 Markov Eduard Valentinovich Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony 25/09/2020 16/09/2020 6,000     20691/13 13/02/2013 Dmitriy Lvovich VASILYEV 1958   Arkadiy Viktorovich VINOGRADOV 1983 Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony 25/09/2020 15/10/2020 6,000     36987/13 20/05/2013 Mikhail Yevgenyevich SAFRONOV 1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 25/09/2020 14/09/2020 6,000     74186/14 13/11/2014 Household Larisa Konstantinovna ROZLOVANU 1980 Dmitriy Viktorovich MININ 1977 Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kostroma Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 25/09/2020 01/07/2020 6,000     52229/17 10/08/2017 Household Vitaliy Anatolyevich SUKHININ 1969 Nadezhda Nikolayevna SUKHININA 1945       03/07/2020 19/08/2020 6,000     4404/18 22/12/2017 Household Sergey Albertovich SHTINNIKOV 1972 Galina Mikhaylovna SHTINNOKIVA 1946       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of detention and the applicant’s placement in a remote correctional facility;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention - the first applicant also complained about his detention in IK-6 Orenburg Region; since 29/08/2002 and pending; 2-3.5 sq. m of personal space; constant electric light, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient electric light 09/10/2020 02/10/2020 15,900     26753/18 19/05/2018 Dmitriy Leonidovich SVETLOV 1965 Ivanova Natalya Vladimirovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote facility. 09/10/2020 20/10/2020 6,000     27633/18 21/05/2018 Dmitriy Sergeyevich POZDNYAKOV 1983     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 01/07/2020 6,000     31074/18 26/06/2018 Household Andrey Anatolyevich YUDIN 1970 Vera Ivanovna YUDINA 1931 Preobrazhenskaya Oksana Vladimirovna Strasbourg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation of to a remote colony. 09/10/2020 10/09/2020 6,000   36052/18 17/07/2018 Aleksandr Viktorovich SBORNYY 1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 20/10/2020 13/08/2020 6,000   43903/18 03/09/2018 Ivan Leonidovich STROKOV 1977       18/09/2020 22/06/2020 6,000   48423/18 27/09/2018 (3 applicants) Household Tatyana Viktorovna PROKHORENKO 1951 Aleksandr Pavlovich PROKHORENKO 1955 Artem Aleksandrovich PROKHORENKO 1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 03/09/2020 16/09/2020 6,000   55439/18 07/03/2019 Vladimir Aleksandrovich POPOV 1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 02/07/2020 6,000   5272/19 04/01/2019 Aleksandr Yuryevich RANNEV 1969 Shipkov Ruslan Valeryevich Volgograd   27/10/2020 06/08/2020 6,000   9497/19 05/02/2019 Household Roman Yuryevich RUDAK 1993 Yuriy Vladimirovich RUDAK 1961       09/10/2020 06/08/2020 6,000   17060/19 06/03/2019 Andrey Anatolyevich SELIVANOV 1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 30/06/2020 6,000   17145/19 06/03/2019 Magomed Pirmagomedovich PIRAYEV 1987       18/09/2020 08/07/2020 6,000   22931/19 05/04/2019 Aleksandr Viktorovich SACHKOV 1982       22/09/2020 30/07/2020 6,000   23520/19 31/05/2019 Aleksandr Nikolayevich TSYPLAKOV 1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport - and in respect of allocation to a remote colony;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - round trip from IK-25 Komi Republic to FKLPUB-18 Komi Republic, van, train; on 03-04/04/2019; overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of fresh air. 09/10/2020 01/09/2020 7,000   28206/19 06/05/2019 Aleksey Yevgenyevich VENGLINSKIY 1980       22/09/2020 03/07/2020 6,000   34544/19 13/06/2019 Andrey Aleksandrovich SILANTYEV 1992     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 22/09/2020 01/07/2020 6,000   37522/19 20/06/2019 Daler Makhmadnaibovich TIRAMOKHIYEV 1974       18/09/2020 27/07/2020 6,000   47758/19 16/10/2019 Grigoriy Aleksandrovich SHEVCHUK 1964     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 03/09/2020 02/10/2020 6,000   47922/19 28/08/2019 Aleksey Vladimirovich TASKIN 1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 22/09/2020 26/06/2020 6,000   50152/19 01/09/2019 Artur Eduardovich SOROKIN 1965     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - and in respect of allocation to a remote colony;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-29 Kirov Region, since 02/10/2018; 2 sq. m of personal space; lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, overcrowding, no or restricted access to shower, lack of privacy for toilet. 09/10/2020 01/09/2020 8,500   58151/19 13/12/2019 Alan Mayranovich SOZAYEV 1987     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 27/10/2020 17/09/2020 6,000   186/20 24/12/2019 Aleksandr Ivanovich SAFRONOV 1966     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 27/10/2020 02/09/2020 6,000   4919/20 09/01/2020 Romel Kaadyr-oolovich SHUURGE 1984 Kozhevnikova Yelena Zafirovna Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation in remote colony. 27/10/2020 25/08/2020 6,000   4958/20 06/01/2020 Roman Anatolyevich SHUT 1973 Korneyev Aleksey Igorevich Bryansk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - and allocation to a remote colony;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-5 Kirov Region from 04/03/2019 to 22/11/2019; 2 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, insufficient number of toilets, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen. 09/10/2020 04/08/2020 7,000   5911/20 14/01/2020 Aleksandr Anatolyevich ZUBOV 1974     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 27/10/2020 07/09/2020 6,000   9799/20 31/01/2020 Marina Mikhaylovna POPOVA 1964     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of placement in a remote colony. 27/10/2020 16/09/2020 6,000   9984/20 06/02/2020 Mikhail Yuryevich PERCHENYUK 1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-8 Komi Republic since 25/10/2018, 2 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell. 20/10/2020 20/08/2020 7,800   16680/20 16/03/2020 Sergey Gennadyevich VANYUKHIN 1968       27/10/2020 19/08/2020 6,000   17756/20 19/03/2020 Aleksey Vladimirovich POTAPOV 1981       27/10/2020 16/09/2020 6,000   19306/20 10/04/2020 Fedor Aleksandrovich TYTSIK 1990 Brester Viktoriya Yevgenyevna Krasnoyarsk   27/10/2020 23/09/2020 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.