CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9E6BC58A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:7pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s94C6321B { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD7AA71C8 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sA3A61D5F { width:158.44pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s26F67D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:3pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s5FFF0A79 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:3pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 66687/09 Roman Yuryevich KISELEV against Russia and 32 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 3   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention (see the appended table). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. Regarding application no. 34448/18, the Court takes note of the death of Ms Somina (the second applicant) and of the wish of her son, Mr Kasarakin (the first applicant), to pursue the proceedings they had initiated. The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case, his or her heirs may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Ječius v. Lithuania , no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX). It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey , no.   54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006). It is clear that given the specific nature of the case related to Article 8 family rights, the first applicant has standing to continue the present proceedings. The Government also did not object. Turning to all of the applications, the Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Holds that Mr Kasarakin has standing to pursue the proceedings initiated jointly by him and his later mother, Ms Somina, the second applicant in case no. 34448/18; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 January 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     66687/09 05/11/2009 Roman Yuryevich KISELEV 1979       18/09/2020 21/09/2020 6,000     19309/13 01/02/2013 Mikhail Mikhaylovich OSHKIN 1976 Druzhkova Olga Vladimirovna Moscow Art. 6 (1) - applicant’s absence from civil proceedings - The applicant challenged actions of FSIN and requested his transfer to another detention facility. He complains that the domestic courts in two instances examined his complaint in his absence. The first-instance court: Guryevsk Town Court of the Kemerovo Region, judgment of 04/05/2012; the appeal court: Kemerovo Regional Court, judgment of 16/10/2012;     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 25/09/2020 22/07/2020 7,500     73561/13 26/05/2014 Aleksandr Ivanovich MAMONOV 1970 Golovenkin Oleg Yuryevich Yoshkar-Ola Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote facility.       25/09/2020 16/09/2020 6,000     60599/17 03/08/2017 (3 applicants) Household Antonina Mikhaylovna KALININA 1946 Nikolay Mikhaylovich KALININ 1946 Sergey Nikolayevich KALININ 1971 Yesina Tatyana Robertovna Sevastopol Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote correctional colony. 09/10/2020 18/09/2020 6,000     78734/17 09/11/2017 (3 applicants) Household Alim Anatolyevich KHOKONOV 1981 Zita Khizirovna KHOKONOVA 1958 Madina Dzhamalovna TSAKOYEVA 1979 Kogan Vanessa Moscow Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 03/09/2020 14/09/2020 6,000     2758/18 19/12/2017 Kurban Ibadullayevich MAGOMEDOV 1971     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-1 Komi Republic, since 2016 and pending; less than 2 sq. m of personal space; infestation of cell with insects/rodents, mouldy or dirty cell. 03/09/2020 23/09/2020 16,600     11587/18 16/02/2018 Aleksey Anatolyevich LIPIN 1979     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 01/07/2020 6,000     21081/18 30/05/2018 Anatoliy Aleksandrovich NAKONECHNYY 1985     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - and in respect of allocation in a remote prison;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-2 Zabaykalskiy Region since 23/06/2017 and pending; 2 sq. m of personal space; lack of privacy for toilet, overcrowding, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower. 09/10/2020 03/08/2020 14,000     31228/18 20/06/2018 Aleksey Sergeyevich GARANIN 1977     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - and in respect of poor conditions of transport and allocation of the applicant in a remote colony;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van from IK-23 Irkutsk Region to SIZO-1 Krasnoyarsk Region and further to IK-5 OIK-36 Krasnoyarsk Region - overcrowding, insufficient natural light restricted access to toilet, potable water, lack of food, 14 and 17/11/2018;   Art 3 inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - conditions of detention in IK-23 Irkutsk Region from 17/01/2018 to 14/11/2018; 1.2 sq. m of personal space; lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air.   18/09/2020 29/06/2020 7,800   32502/18 13/06/2018 Household Mikhail Vasilyevich MALTSEV 1968 Valentina Petrovna MALTSEVA 1938     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 22/09/2020 23/07/2020 6,000   34448/18 12/07/2018 Household Aleksandr Vasilyevich KASARAKIN 1970 Raisa Georgiyevna SOMINA b:1941 d: 2020 Radnayeva Nadezhda Valeryevna Moscow Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote facility. 09/10/2020 24/08/2020 6,000   (to be paid to Mr Kasarakin)   35670/18 06/11/2018 Aleksey Vladimirovich NIKOLAYEV 1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote facility. 09/10/2020 03/08/2020 6,000   40813/18 13/08/2018 Aleksandr Mikhaylovich KOTOV 1965     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony;   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - the applicant alleged that since 20/07/2017 he has been subject to a permanent video surveillance in the living premises of the colony.     22/09/2020 06/07/2020 6,000   41661/18 26/04/2018 Sergey Venidiktovich NAUMOV 1967     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 17/07/2020 6,000   45512/18 28/11/2018 Sergey Aleksandrovich KULIKOV 1975     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 09/10/2020 24/08/2020 6,000   52109/18 09/01/2019 Igor Gennadyevich MOROZOV 1981       18/09/2020 11/08/2020 6,000   52152/18 25/10/2018 Household Viktor Sergeyevich KOSTENETSKIY 1982 Natalya Sergeyevna KOSTENETSKA 1976   Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention of disabled inmates - the first applicant had a part of left leg amputated. He did not receive proper prosthetic treatment during his detention. The Medical Expert Bureau developed an individual rehabilitation program for the first applicant, stating that a prosthetic leg should be provided to him; that he should be given orthopaedic shoes for his healthy leg; and special shoes for the prosthetic leg. He has not been given them until his release from IK-6 Kirov Region;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - taking into account his personal situation of a disabled inmate. 20/10/2020 20/10/2020 7,800   1394/19 04/02/2019 Mikhail Agoylinovich KAZAKBAYEV 1964         09/10/2020 30/09/2020 6,000   12972/19 31/07/2019 Vitaliy Vladimirovich KABANOV 1979     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 08/07/2020 6,000   13679/19 10/07/2019 Sergey Alekseyevich BURDAKIN 1971     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;   Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention - Poor conditions of detention in the prison hospital LIU-35 Khakasiya Republic, until September 2019; poor quality of food, lack of privacy for toilet. 03/09/2020 18/09/2020 6,000   18354/19 08/10/2019 Konstantin Viktorovich MERZLYAKOV 1990     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote facility. 09/10/2020 03/08/2020 6,000   23555/19 17/04/2019 Alimaa Olegovna KHENEN 1980 Kozhevnikova Yelena Zafirovna Nizhniy Tagil Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 01/07/2020 6,000   28872/19 17/07/2019 Igor Yevgenyevich PANKO 1965     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 22/09/2020 29/06/2020 6,000   53423/19 24/09/2019 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich PALAUKHIN 1979     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 03/09/2020 15/09/2020 6,000   54438/19 26/09/2019 Vyacheslav Vladimirovich PAVLETSOV 1983       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 03/09/2020 14/09/2020 6,000   62567/19 15/11/2019 Ruslan Nikolayevich ODINARTSEV 1992     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 27/10/2020 04/09/2020 6,000   5215/20 24/12/2019 Aleksey Aleksandrovich ORLOV 1981 Lyubimkin Sergey Ivanovich Nizhniy Novgorod   20/10/2020 16/09/2020 6,000   6375/20 09/01/2020 Dmitriy Mikhaylovich KURBATOV 1977       27/10/2020 15/10/2020 6,000   7605/20 17/01/2020 Andrey Olegovich NIKITIN 1983       27/10/2020 02/10/2020 6,000   9096/20 23/01/2020 Gurgen Gagikovich KOSTANYAN 1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 27/10/2020 05/10/2020 6,000   10528/20 31/01/2020 Aslan Abdulmedzhidovich MUSLIMOV 1977       27/10/2020 18/08/2020 6,000   13742/20 14/02/2020 Zhanna Fedorovna MIRISHANOVA 1968 Galtseva Margarita Valeryevna Saratov Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 20/10/2020 11/09/2020 6,000   14784/20 12/03/2020 Aleksey Yuryevich KURDYUKOV 1976     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 27/10/2020 31/08/2020 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.