CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sC6726222 { width:137.43pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 12734/19 Zahid MALKOČ against Bosnia and Herzegovina and 11 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 17   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms H. Kapetan, a lawyer practising in Travnik. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions against the Una-Sana Canton were communicated to the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Government”). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court has recently examined the leading case concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions against the Una-Sana Canton (see Šarganović and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), nos. 28251/18 and 19 others, 3 December 2020). Having noted that the Una-Sana Canton had adopted an action plan, undertaking to enforce all decisions against it in chronological order, by 2040, the Court found that the matter had been resolved. There is no reason to decide otherwise in the present case. In view of the above, the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article   37 §   1   (b) of the Convention and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the applications under Article   37   §   1 in fine . Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 January 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Relevant domestic decision     12734/19 27/02/2019 Zahid MALKOČ 1961 Municipal Court in Bihać, 12/10/2006   Municipal Court in Bihać, 01/04/2014       12735/19 27/02/2019 Ismet BRKIĆ 1944 Municipal Court in Bihać, 01/11/2007   Municipal Court in Bihać, 02/03/2012       12736/19 27/02/2019 Lejla MUJADŽIĆ 1980 Municipal Court in Bihać, 20/09/2007   Municipal Court in Bihać, 29/08/2008       12738/19 27/02/2019 Nuho KURTOVIĆ 1961 Municipal Court in Sanski Most, 20/05/2005   Municipal Court in Sanski Most, 29/09/2008   Municipal Court in Sanski Most, 29/09/2008       12739/19 27/02/2019 Đurđica BIŠĆEVIĆ 1948 Municipal Court in Bihać, 17/07/2006   Municipal Court in Bihać, 26/12/2008       12741/19 27/02/2019 Dženana MUJADŽIĆ 1972 Municipal Court in Bihać, 14/02/2008   Municipal Court in Bihać, 22/09/2008       12742/19 27/02/2019 Senija ALAGIĆ 1950 Municipal Court in Bihać, 16/11/2006   Municipal Court in Bihać, 31/01/2011       16037/19 04/03/2019 Mejasa DUPANOVIĆ 1947 Municipal Court in Bihać, 11/04/2005   Municipal Court in Bihać, 20/10/2006   Municipal Court in Bihać, 13/02/2008   Municipal Court in Bihać, 30/05/2012       34089/19 20/06/2019 Franka JURIĆ 1941 Municipal Court in Bihać, 11/04/2005       34093/19 20/06/2019 Aziza ARNAUTOVIĆ 1944 Municipal Court in Bihać, 11/04/2005   Municipal Court in Bihać, 23/11/2005     37531/19 28/06/2019 Nerminka HUSKIĆ-BALIĆ 1977 Municipal Court in Bihać, 15/03/2005   Municipal Court in Bihać, 29/09/2006   Municipal Court in Bihać, 11/11/2009     38181/19 02/07/2019 Ademira TIPURA TIJANOVIĆ 1964 Municipal Court in Bihać, 23/11/2007   Municipal Court in Bihać, 25/06/2010