CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sC6726222 { width:137.43pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sFF075836 { margin-right:7.05pt; margin-left:7.05pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 33672/18 Jelena JURIĆ against Bosnia and Herzegovina and 14 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 17   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms H. Kapetan, a lawyer practising in Travnik. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions against the Una-Sana Canton were communicated to the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Government”). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court has recently examined the leading case concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions against the Una-Sana Canton (see Šarganović and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), nos. 28251/18 and 19 others, 3 December 2020). Having noted that the Una-Sana Canton had adopted an action plan, undertaking to enforce all decisions against it in chronological order, by 2040, the Court found that the matter had been resolved. There is no reason to decide otherwise in the present case. In view of the above , the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article   37 §   1   (b) of the Convention and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the applications under Article   37   §   1 in fine . Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 January 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Relevant domestic decision     33672/18 26/06/2018 Jelena JURIĆ 1962 Municipal Court in Bihać, 18/08/2005   Municipal Court in Bihać, 24/01/2007   Municipal Court in Bihać, 27/03/2008       33678/18 26/06/2018 Šefika ČATAKOVIĆ 1945 Municipal Court in Cazin, 21/01/2005   Municipal Court in Cazin, 21/03/2005   Municipal Court in Cazin, 29/05/2008   Municipal Court in Cazin, 08/07/2009       33682/18 26/06/2018 Emina MIDŽIĆ 1944 Municipal Court in Bihać, 04/08/2005             33695/18 26/06/2018 Fadil MAHMUTOVIĆ 1940 Municipal Court in Bihać, 27/10/2005   Municipal Court in Bihać, 16/02/2007       33700/18 26/06/2018 Hadžera BADIĆ 1942 Municipal Court in Bihać, 09/01/2006   Municipal Court in Bihać, 08/06/2007   Municipal Court in Bihać, 28/05/2010       33719/18 26/06/2018 Zineta DURDŽIĆ 1975 Municipal Court in Bosanska Krupa, 25/10/2007   Municipal Court in Bosanska Krupa, 14/01/2008   Municipal Court in Bosanska Krupa, 20/11/2009       33792/18 26/06/2018 Ismeta MUJAKIĆ 1946 Municipal Court in Cazin, 29/12/2004   Municipal Court in Cazin, 29/12/2004   Municipal Court in Cazin, 15/10/2008                 33794/18 26/06/2018 Ćima KURTOVIĆ 1961 Municipal Court in Sanski Most, 11/05/2007   Municipal Court in Sanski Most, 18/01/2010   Municipal Court in Sanski Most, 05/11/2012       33823/18 26/06/2018 Mira KLARIĆ 1952 Municipal Court in Bihać, 12/11/2007     34077/18 26/06/2018 Zajko SITNIĆ 1942 Municipal Court in Bihać, 18/08/2005   Municipal Court in Bihać, 06/03/2008   Municipal Court in Bihać, 09/01/2006   Municipal Court in Bihać, 19/10/2009   Municipal Court in Bihać, 22/10/2010     34084/18 26/06/2018 Meleća ABDIĆ 1944 Municipal Court in Cazin, 13/05/2005     34090/18 26/06/2018 Muhiba SELIMOVIĆ 1942 Municipal Court in Bihać, 17/12/2004   Municipal Court in Bihać, 01/08/2005         34093/18 26/06/2018 Ahmo DEDIĆ 1943 Municipal Court in Cazin, 22/04/2004   Municipal Court in Cazin, 06/09/2007   Municipal Court in Cazin, 22/02/2008   Municipal Court in Cazin, 22/03/2006     34096/18 26/06/2018 Hasan BADIĆ 1945 Municipal Court in Cazin, 21/01/2005   Municipal Court in Cazin, 29/06/2005   Municipal Court in Cazin, 14/07/2008   Municipal Court in Cazin, 31/01/2012     37715/18 18/07/2018 Merima DERVIĆ 1966 Municipal Court in Bosanska Krupa, 22/06/2007   Municipal Court in Bosanska Krupa, 28/11/2008   Municipal Court in Bosanska Krupa, 04/12/2009   Municipal Court in Bosanska Krupa, 27/03/2013