CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s749C56BD { margin-left:27.6pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.6pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold } .sCA386EC { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:27.6pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.6pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .s8D893B61 { width:152.77pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sFF075836 { margin-right:7.05pt; margin-left:7.05pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 37268/19 Vladimir STOJANOVIĆ against Serbia and 7 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 17   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Carlo Ranzoni, President,   Branko Lubarda,   Pauliine Koskelo, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on 14 June 2019, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms V. Tasić, a lawyer practising in Leskovac. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the non-enforcement of domestic decisions given against a socially/State-owned company were communicated to the Serbian Government (“the Government”). THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. Complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement of domestic decisions given against a socially/State-owned company) In the present applications, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that the respondent Government cannot be held liable for the non-enforcement of the domestic decisions since the applicants failed to use the remedies provided by the Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time Act ( Zakon o zaštiti prava na suđenje u razumnom roku , published in Official Gazette no. 40/2015). The Court held in Stanković v. Serbia ((dec.), no. 41285/19, § 22, 3 December 2019) that the applicant who had used the said remedies had lost her status as a “victim” within the meaning of Article   34 of the Convention. The present applicants have not explained why those remedies would have been inadequate or ineffective in their case. In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§   1 and   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 January 2021.   Liv Tigerstedt   Carlo Ranzoni   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Relevant domestic decision Start date of non-enforcement period End date of non-enforcement period Length of enforcement proceedings     37268/19 14/06/2019 Vladimir STOJANOVIĆ 22/09/1961 Municipal Court in Leskovac, 08/12/2005   28/07/2006   pending More than 14 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 23 day(s)       37352/19 14/06/2019 Stanoja MILOŠEVIĆ 13/04/1956 Municipal Court in Leskovac, 13/12/2005   16/03/2006   pending More than 14 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 4 day(s)       37356/19 14/06/2019 Vladica MITIĆ 28/10/1977 Municipal Court in Leskovac, 19/11/2008   08/07/2009   pending More than 11 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 12 day(s)       37362/19 14/06/2019 Kostadin NEDELJKOVIĆ 22/09/1961 Municipal Court in Leskovac, 08/12/2005   28/07/2006   pending More than 14 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 23 day(s)       37364/19 14/06/2019 Dušan MILOVANOVIĆ 03/05/1955 Municipal Court in Leskovac, 15/03/2006   19/06/2006   pending More than 14 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 1 day(s)       37368/19 14/06/2019 Bratislav KRSTIĆ 14/02/1969 Municipal Court in Leskovac, 08/12/2005   28/07/2006   pending More than 14 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 23 day(s)       37376/19 14/06/2019 Sreten KOCIĆ 05/06/1953 Municipal Court in Leskovac, 15/03/2006   19/06/2006   pending More than 14 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 1 day(s)       37379/19 14/06/2019 Safet ŠISTEK 05/11/1955 Municipal Court in Leskovac, 11/04/2007 17/06/2010   pending More than 10 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 3 day(s)