CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s838106AB { width:144.53pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s48941B3D { width:6.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sED2FFA7C { width:1.88pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40487/16 Dumitru-Cristinel PĂTRUŢESCU against Romania and 11 other applications (see appended table)     The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 17   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. All applicants have been released from prison. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 January 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter Time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison       40487/16 08/07/2016 Dumitru-Cristinel PĂTRUŢESCU 1974 31/01/2017 19/08/2020 26/08/2020 Letter returned as recipient “moved” 30/09/2020 04/09/2018       42979/16 25/08/2016 Alexandru-Nicolae MUNTEAN 1987 26/09/2016 19/08/2020 01/09/2020 Illegible signature 30/09/2020 13/06/2019       43921/16 12/09/2016 Ion VREJITORU 1965 12/09/2016 19/08/2020 25/08/2020 Signed by the applicant’s daughter 30/09/2020 24/07/2018       45345/16 06/09/2016 Alexandru-Leonardo CHIORAN 1982 06/09/2016 19/08/2020 27/08/2020 Signed by the applicant 30/09/2020 03/04/2018       46332/16 29/08/2016 Ovidiu DUDAŞ 1992 12/07/2017 19/08/2020 31/08/2020 Illegible signature 30/09/2020 15/05/2018       49864/16 03/01/2017 Laurențiu CHELMU 1990 24/03/2017 19/08/2020 26/08/2020 Signed by the applicant 30/09/2020 17/07/2018       50969/16 23/09/2016 Noe-Marian BRUMAR 1991   Represented by Virág Sándor, Sfantu Gheorghe 23/09/2016 19/08/2020 01/09/2020 Signed by the applicant’s representative 30/09/2020 07/05/2018       51499/16 28/09/2016 Bogdan-Constantin GÂNDAC 1995   Represented by Virág Sándor, Sfantu Gheorghe 28/09/2016 19/08/2020 01/09/2020 Signed by the applicant’s representative 30/09/2020 19/10/2017       51706/16 14/10/2016 Constantin GIURA 1992 18/11/2016 19/08/2020 25/08/2020 Illegible signature 30/09/2020 21/11/2017   52108/16 13/10/2016 Gheorghe LEPĂDATU 1982   Represented by Robert Mihail, Moreni 13/10/2016 19/08/2020 Handed over to the recipient on 25/08/2020 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 30/09/2020 03/10/2018   61088/16 19/01/2017 Dinarlî ALI 1979 19/01/2017 19/08/2020 23/09/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 30/09/2020 30/09/2019   64463/16 25/01/2017 Vasile LĂCĂTUȘ 1991 25/01/2017 19/08/2020 Handed over to the recipient on 28/08/2020 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 30/09/2020 14/04/2019