CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 janvier 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC002386616
- Date
- 21 janvier 2021
- Publication
- 21 janvier 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s232829D8 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7AF9E746 { width:20.69pt; display:inline-block } .s838106AB { width:144.53pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 23866/16 Mihai MUREȘAN against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 21   January 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 22   July 2016, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Mihai Mureșan, was born on 7 November 1984. The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit observations in reply. Since the applicant was represented by Mr A.V. Țigan, a detainee as well, the Registry sent that letter to Mr Tigan. On 15 July 2020 Mr Tigan notified the Court that he was no longer in contact with the applicant and that the latter might have been released. Following that reply, the Registry resent the letter to the applicant’s home address. The letter returned on 3 August 2020, mentioning “the recipient is in detention”. The Registry therefore sent another letter to the prison where the applicant appeared to have been detained according to the information submitted by the Government on 18 December 2019. On 26 November 2020 the prison authorities notified the Court that the applicant had refused to receive the letter, claiming that he had never lodged an application before the Court. The prison authorities indicated the date of birth of the addressee which corresponds to the applicant’s date of birth in the present application. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 February 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 21 janvier 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC002386616
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral