CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 4 février 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sA3A61D5F { width:158.44pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .s97C4337 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 1858/17 Rustam Mugutdinovich ABDULLAYEV and Others against Russia and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 4   February 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 25 February 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/ household (in euros) [1]     1858/17 19/11/2016 (7 applicants) Household Rustam Mugutdinovich ABDULLAYEV 1987 Amir Rustamovich ABDULLAYEV 2018 Mugutdin Magomedovich ABDULLAYEV 1963 Ruslan Rustamovich ABDULLAYEV 2011 Cristina Vladimirovna ABDULLAYEVA 1983 Muminat Gadzhimuradovna ABDULLAYEVA 1965 Zinfira Mugutdinovna MAMEDOVA 1996     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 03/07/2020 05/01/2021 6,000     40323/18 24/07/2018 Pavel Valeryevich ARTEMYEV 1984 Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport- and allocation to a remote correctional colony,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - Train, transit cell, van (20/05/2018-20/05/2018; 03/04/2018-04/06/2018); overcrowding, lack of fresh air,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in Ik-23 Murmansk Region since 23/05/2015 and on-going, less than 2 sq m of personal space; bunk beds, lack of privacy for toilet, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, shower once a week, insufficient toiletries, poor quality of food, overcrowding. 09/10/2020 05/01/2021 13,700     50940/18 17/10/2018 Gasan Adilovich   GUSEYNOV 1967 Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich Syktyvkar Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - and in respect of allocation to a remote facility,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction   - detention in IK-23 Murmansk Region since 01/06/2015 and pending; 2.3 sq m of personal space; overcrowding, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, inadequate clothing allowance, insufficient number of toilets and wash basins, lack of privacy for toilet. 09/10/2020 05/01/2021 13,000     30736/19 20/05/2019   AND   34256/19 07/06/2019 Household Vitaliy Vladimirovich TOLSTOKOROV 1983 Mariya Vladimirovna TOLSTOKOROVA 1987       22/09/2020 01/07/2020 6,000     59261/19 22/10/2019 Igor Viktorovich BAZHIN 1977       07/12/2020 23/07/2020 6,000     59294/19 30/10/2019 Viktor Aleksandrovich MOLODOV 1955       07/12/2020 03/08/2020 6,000     59575/19 31/10/2019 Vail Vakilevich KHABIBULLIN 1973     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 07/12/2020 24/07/2020 6,000     2432/20 18/12/2019 Andrey Gennadyevich PAKHALENKOV 1975     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 20/10/2020 21/12/2020 6,000     3012/20 26/12/2019 Isa Abbasovich YANAYEV 1986     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation into remote colony. 07/12/2020 20/08/2020 6,000   5148/20 09/01/2020 Sergey Vadimovich MURAVYEV 1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 01/12/2020 16/12/2020 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.