CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 4 février 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .sA2CEA1D7 { width:125.74pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s751619E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; line-height:115% } .sD2B550CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; line-height:115% } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sB7A8F5FE { height:227.15pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 11365/20 Erzsébet Andrea DETTRE against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 4   February 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Péter Paczolay,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 25 February 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/registration   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     11365/20 23/02/2020 Erzsébet Andrea DETTRE 1955       27/08/2020 04/12/2020 2,500     15848/20 23/03/2020 (18 applicants)   Krisztina CSAJÁGI 1973   Renáta CSAJÁGI 1973   Éva LAMPERTNÉ HORVÁTH 1958   Piroska MAKRÁNÉ HORVÁTH 1956   Edina RIKKERNÉ JUHÁSZ 1965   József SCHNEIDLER 1972   Péter SCHNEIDLER 1977   Miklós VÖRÖS 1969   Household Lajos NÉMETH 1940 Lajosné NÉMETH 1946     Household Zsigmond CSAJÁGI 1975 Zsigmondné CSAJÁGI 1950   Household Attila MÁTÉ 1940 Attiláné MÁTÉ 1951   Household Csaba JUHÁSZ 1960 Marianna JUHÁSZNÉ BRUZSA 1962   Household József VÖRÖS 1966 Éva Katalin VÖRÖSNÉ SCHNEIDLER 1972 Czirmes György Budapest   20/11/2020 15/07/2020 6,800     23245/20 13/05/2020 Zsolt Dénes ZÁRA 1968 Váczi Péter Győr   21/12/2020 09/09/2020 3,300     24289/20 03/06/2020 Gabriella PACKNÉ NÁNÁSI 1964       25/11/2020 05/01/2021 11,700     24728/20 26/05/2020 Helga CSAPÓ 1977 Baruch Gábor Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 29/10/2020 07/12/2020 3,300     25745/20 26/05/2020 (3 applicants) Adrienn Ivett TURANECZ 1987   Household Anikó TURANECZ 1967 László BALÁZS 1976 Gál Anna Budapest   18/11/2020 19/11/2020 2,600     25784/20 19/05/2020 (9 applicants) Katalin APAGYI 1967 Sándorné BUSI 1949 Viktor GOGOS 1978 István GŐGÖS 1948 Krisztina MOLNÁRNÉ BUSI 1969 László MÜLLER 1987 Tímea MÜLLER 1985   Household László MÜLLER 1960 Lászlóné MÜLLER 1961 Czirmes György Budapest   16/11/2020 12/10/2020 10,900     26559/20 20/05/2020 CSEKE KFT. 1993 Farkas Sándor Hévíz   16/11/2020 24/09/2020 3,300     31104/20 23/07/2020 Julianna Irén SZRAPKÓ 1986 Botka Edit Cegléd Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 29/10/2020 04/12/2020 6,500   31517/20 15/07/2020 Sándorné GULYÁS 1958 Bajusz Krisztina Ilona Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 01/12/2020 03/12/2020 2,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.