CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 16 février 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF114237 { width:19.02pt; display:inline-block } .s812AA33A { width:163.2pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s2753FA3F { width:163.53pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 21330/19 Fatma Betül ZEYBEK and Others against Turkey   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 16   February 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Aleš Pejchal, President ,   Egidijus Kūris,   Carlo Ranzoni, judges , and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 April 2019, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. 2.     The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.     The application concerned the alleged disappearance of Mr Salim Zeybek, the applicants’ relative, following his alleged abduction by unknown persons on 21 February 2019 and the alleged lack of an effective investigation into his disappearance. 4.     On 30 April 2019 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants’ complaints raised under Articles 2, 3 and 5 of the Convention. 5.     On 31 October 2020 the applicants informed the Court that they wanted to withdraw the application since Mr Zeybek was found on 28   July 2019 and stated that he had not been abducted, as alleged.   THE LAW 6.     The Court takes note of the wish expressed by the applicants to withdraw the application. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. 7.     In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 25 March 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Hasan Bakırcı   Aleš Pejchal   Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No. Applicant’s Name Birth year Nationality Place of residence 1 Fatma Betül ZEYBEK   1984 Turkish Ankara 2 Azime AYDIN   1967 Turkish Ankara 3 Mustafa AYDIN   1958 Turkish Ankara 4 Abdullah ZEYBEK   1955 Turkish Ankara 5 Cafer Sedat ZEYBEK   2011 Turkish Ankara 6 Esra ZEYBEK   1994 Turkish Ankara 7 Hatice ZEYBEK   1959 Turkish Ankara 8 Selma ZEYBEK   2013 Turkish Ankara