CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 février 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .sF969DDFE { width:131.28pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s83247196 { width:152.29pt; display:inline-block } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 1268/16 Ifim TUDORACHE against Romania and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 18   February 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). All the applicants have been released from prison. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 March 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date and reason of return of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant   Date of the applicant’s release from prison     1268/16 18/12/2015 Ifim TUDORACHE 1971 06/01/2016 14/10/2020 30/10/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 25/11/2020 17/11/2017     27326/16 01/06/2016 Marius-Daniel TRUȚĂ 1974 21/03/2017 14/10/2020 30/10/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 25/11/2020 21/02/2018     37549/16 22/08/2016 Cristian CIUCĂ 1989 03/10/2016 14/10/2020 23/10/2020 Letter returned as recipient “moved” 25/11/2020 07/03/2018     39246/16 03/08/2016 Nicolae DONCIU 1981 21/11/2016 12/10/2020 27/10/2020 Letter returned as recipient “moved” 23/11/2020 22/05/2018     61271/16 20/01/2017 Nicolae ANDREIAȘ 1985 31/01/2017 14/10/2020 06/11/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 25/11/2020 04/12/2018     72759/16 02/03/2017 Mădălin-Cristian BUZNEAN 1988 08/03/2017 12/10/2020 13/11/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 23/11/2020 18/02/2019     2348/17 27/02/2017 Robert-Iulian GHEORGHE 1985 06/03/2017 12/10/2020 13/11/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 23/11/2020 23/11/2017     4612/17 15/12/2016 Ionuț-Radu BOȚOTEANU 1980 22/02/2017 12/10/2020 06/11/2020 Letter returned as “unclaimed” 23/11/2020 11/04/2018     12288/17 28/03/2017 Ionuț Gheorghe TITIRIGĂ 1992 06/08/2020 08/10/2020 22/10/2020 Letter returned as recipient “moved”   19/11/2020 25/12/2018   18035/17 15/05/2017 Gheorghe BUȚOI 1982 22/05/2017 13/11/2020 03/12/2020 Letter returned as recipient “moved” 08/01/2021 11/11/2018