CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 février 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218DEC008100517
- Date
- 18 février 2021
- Publication
- 18 février 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s3B53EBCC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s71833996 { width:42.55pt; display:inline-block } .s19D06859 { width:234.09pt; display:inline-block } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sA4FA8E5F { width:143.76pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s26725EEE { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s97C4337 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 81005/17 Sarvat Rajab oglu RZAMOV against Azerbaijan and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 18   February 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Ganna Yudkivska, President,   Ivana Jelić,   Arnfinn Bårdsen, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Mr A. Mustafayev and Mr   R.   Mustafazade, lawyers based in Azerbaijan. The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 1, Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (c), and   Article 9 of the Convention concerning their allegedly unlawful arrest and detention, the alleged unlawful interference with their freedom of religion and the alleged unfairness of the administrative proceedings against them on account of violating the legislative rules on organising and holding religious meetings were communicated to the Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Azerbaijan in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 March 2021.     {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Ganna Yudkivska   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 § 1, Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (c), and   Article 9 of the Convention No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     81005/17 04/11/2017 Sarvat Rajab oglu RZAMOV 1987 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750     81009/17 06/11/2017 Vasif Agabala oglu GULIYEV 1974 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750     81024/17 16/11/2017 Azad Rustam oglu GASIMOV 1978 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750     81043/17 16/11/2017 Fakhraddin Nasraddin oglu KHANLAYEV 1967 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750     81049/17 06/11/2017 Elmar Akbar oglu ALIYEV 1969 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750     81051/17 04/11/2017 Khaspulad Balahmad oglu SHIKHMAMMADOV 1963 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750     81083/17 07/11/2017 Sakhavat Agali oglu SEYFALOV 1983 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750     81084/17 06/11/2017 Natig Kamil oglu AMRAHOV 1966 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750     81088/17 16/11/2017 Akram Nazim oglu BADIRKHANOV 1960 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750   81095/17 04/11/2017 Lutfaddin Valeh oglu GULALIYEV 1959 Mustafazade Ruslan Mustafayev Asabali 25/11/2020 15/10/2020 3,750   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 18 février 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218DEC008100517
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral