CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 11 mars 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7486CA7E { width:0.34pt; display:inline-block } .s574E4C05 { width:124.18pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s2DC98A4F { margin-left:29.67pt; text-align:center; padding-left:6.33pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s9E774500 { height:38.5pt } .s9992913D { margin-left:34.12pt; text-align:center; padding-left:1.88pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 36283/16 Tudor ROŞU against Romania and 15 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 11   March 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 1 April 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison   36283/16 15/07/2016 Tudor ROŞU 1973     22/08/2016 25/09/2020 09/10/2020 Illegible signature 06/11/2020 21/09/2016   37739/16 22/06/2016 Ioan FULIAȘ 1962     03/10/2016 14/09/2020 22/09/2020 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother 26/10/2020 22/01/2019   37798/16 21/07/2016 Irinel-Florinel TĂNDICĂ 1977     23/02/2017 14/09/2020 22/09/2020 Signed for receipt by a relative 26/10/2020 31/07/2018   37974/16 28/07/2016 Adrian Dumitru FELEA 1973     08/06/2020 25/09/2020 08/10/2020 Signed for receipt by representative of the prison’s administration 06/11/2020 According to the applicant’s letter of 08/06/2020, he was still in detention in Brăila Prison at the time.   51085/16 16/11/2016 Florin URECHEATU 1984     26/12/2016 12/10/2020 10/11/2020 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother 23/11/2020 19/06/2019   76407/16 28/01/2017 Virgil-Alin TIMIȘ 1985 Slageana Timiș, Foeni 28/01/2017 25/09/2020 07/10/2020 Signed for receipt by a relative 06/11/2020 12/03/2018   77392/16 04/04/2017 Mihai IONESCU 1981     29/08/2019 25/09/2020 09/10/2020 Signed for receipt by the applicant 06/11/2020 20/08/2019   77420/16 03/01/2017 Dorin NEAGU 1987     29/03/2018 25/09/2020 13/10/2020 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother 06/11/2020 07/05/2019   77483/16 20/01/2017 Paris RUXANDAR 1985     28/04/2017 25/09/2020 06/10/2020 Signed for receipt by the applicant 06/11/2020 25/07/2018   77792/16 13/02/2017 Alexandru Ion DUMBRAVĂ 1985     13/02/2017 25/09/2020 06/10/2020 Illegible signature 06/11/2020 According to the Government’s observations of 20/01/2020, the applicant was still in detention in Giurgiu Prison at the time.   191/17 23/01/2017 Alin BÂNDULĂ 1974     23/05/2020 28/09/2020 07/10/2020 Signed for receipt by representative of the prison’s administration 09/11/2020 15/06/2018 According to the Government’s observations of 20/01/2020, the applicant was reincarcerated on 04/11/2018. According to the applicant’s letter of 23/05/2020, he was still in detention in Giurgiu Prison at the time.   876/17 10/03/2017 Constantin CRĂESCU 1977     10/03/2017 28/09/2020 09/10/2020 Signed by a third party living at the address indicated in the application form as correspondence address 09/11/2020 04/12/2018   2359/17 06/02/2017 Vadar VĂDUVA 1978     15/06/2017 29/09/2020 08/10/2020 Signed for receipt by representative of the prison’s administration 10/11/2020 20/11/2018 According to the Government’s observations of 18/02/2020, the applicant was reincarcerated on 22/05/2019. He was still in detention in Brăila Prison at the time.   3939/17 06/03/2017 Daniel CIURARIU 1993     07/07/2017 29/09/2020 09/10/2020 Signed for receipt by representative of the prison’s administration 10/11/2020 According to the Government’s observations of 18/02/2020, the applicant was still in detention in Arad Prison at the time.   5350/17 15/02/2017 Vergil-Ionuț NAVACOVSCHI 1980     15/02/2017 29/09/2020 09/10/2020 Illegible signature 10/11/2020 According to the Government’s observations of 18/02/2020, the applicant was still in detention in Târgu ‑ Jiu Prison at the time.   7256/17 02/03/2017 Adrian-Mădălin HÎRJA 1993     02/03/2017 29/09/2020 08/10/2020 Illegible signature 10/11/2020 24/05/2019