CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 mars 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s10FEB019 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; widows:0; orphans:0 } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .sB0BEFF64 { width:123.41pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 13371/16 Ogtay Sabir oglu MURADOV and Sabina Sabir gizi ALIZADA against Azerbaijan and 7 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 25   March 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Ganna Yudkivska, President,   Ivana Jelić,   Arnfinn Bårdsen, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention concerning the non ‑ enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions were communicated to the Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”). In application no. 13371/16 complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention (see the appended table below). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Azerbaijan in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The Government also undertake to ensure the enforcement of the domestic   decisions under consideration in the cases concerned within the same three-month period, and to pay any costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. The payment and the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the cases concerned will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 April 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Ganna Yudkivska   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of the Protocol No. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth (where relevant) Representative ‘s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Relevant domestic decision Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non ‑ pecuniary damage per applicant/ household (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2]     13371/16 25/02/2016 Household Ogtay Sabir oglu MURADOV 1974 Sabina Sabir gizi ALIZADA 1977     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of non-enforcement of domestic decision Nizami District Court, 04/09/2012 12/01/2021 09/12/2020 3,600       248/17 19/12/2016 Saida Huseyn gizi GASIMOVA 1969 Ruslan Asabali oglu MUSTAFAZADE   Sumgayit   Baku Administrative Court, 10/06/2014 12/01/2021 11/11/2020 3,600 250     3351/17 29/12/2016 Bafadar Malik oglu NABIYEV 1957 Gulsahab Nasib gizi ALLAHVERDIYEVA   Baku       Yasamal District Court, 30/04/2013 12/01/2021 11/01/2021 3,600 250     55746/17 20/07/2017 ASTARA SMALL ENTERPRISE Ruslan Asabali oglu MUSTAFAZADE   Sumgayit   The Supreme Court, 06/09/2016   The Sumgayit Court of Appeal, 23/11/2016   12/01/2021 11/11/2020 2,100 250     72973/17 02/10/2017 Household Sara Bahram gizi FARAJZADE 1958 Farid Mazahir oglu FARAJZADE 1987   Sadig Tofig oglu BAGIROV   Khirdalan   Sabail District Court, 25/04/2006 12/01/2021 09/10//2020 3,600 250     1124/18 22/12/2017 Khalida Shafagat gizi BUNYATOVA 1962         Binagadi District Court, 21/06/2014 12/01/2021 05/11/2020 3,600       1130/18 22/12/2017 Sayyara Jalal gizi MIRZAYEVA 1960         Binagadi District Court, 17/03/2014 12/01/2021 04/11/2020 3,600       48318/18 04/10/2018 Rauf Majid oglu BAYRAMOV 1939       Baku Court of Appeal, 17/03/2014 12/01/2021 11/12/2020 2400     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.