CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 mars 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s418B82EF { width:132.42pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF06D3D4E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s8EB5F569 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super } .sF74FB0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.5pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 23224/17 Čedomir ČUTOVIĆ against Serbia and 14 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 25   March 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Carlo Ranzoni, President,   Branko Lubarda,   Pauliine Koskelo, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms D. Janković , a lawyer practising in Čačak. The applicant in application no. 65457/17, Mr Sretenović , died on 13 April 2020. The Government accepted his widow, Ms Radmila Sretenović, as the applicant’s legal heir. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 concerning the delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies were communicated to the Serbian Government (“the Government”). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants/heir of the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the death of Mr Sretenović and of the wish of his widow to pursue the proceedings. The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case his or her heirs may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Ječius v. Lithuania , no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX; Shiryayeva v. Russia , no. 21417/04, §§   8-9, 13 July 2006; and Horváthová v. Slovakia , no. 74456/01, § 26, 17   May 2005). Nothing suggests that the rights the applicant sought to protect through the Convention mechanism were eminently personal and non-transferable (see Malhous v.   the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071/96, §   1, 12   July 2001). The Government did not contend that Ms Sretenović had no standing to pursue the case. Therefore, the Court considers that the applicant’s widow has a legitimate interest in pursuing the application. The Court further takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides that in respect of application no.   65457/17 Ms   Sretenović has standing to continue the proceedings in her late husband’s stead; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 April 2021.   Viktoriya Maradudina   Carlo Ranzoni   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] 2 Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) 3     23224/17 20/03/2017 Čedomir ČUTOVIĆ 1945 10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250     65183/17 25/08/2017 Mišo MARKOVIĆ 1964 10/09/2020 25/06/2020 1,000 250     65189/17 25/08/2017 Gordana SRETENOVIĆ 1972 10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250     65455/17 25/08/2017 Darko DUKIĆ 1956 10/09/2020 25/06/2020 1,000 250     65457/17 25/08/2017 Dragan SRETENOVIĆ Year of birth: 1951 Date of death: 13/04/2020   Pursued by heir: Radmila Sretenović 1957   10/09/2020 09/12/2020 1,000 250     69395/17 15/09/2017 Mirjana FILIPOVIĆ 1954 10/09/2020 25/06/2020 1,000 250     71595/17 29/09/2017 Milomir TUBA 1962 10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250     71598/17 29/09/2017 Uroš ĆUBOVIĆ 1940 10/09/2020 25/06/2020 1,000 250     71907/17 29/09/2017 Veroljub MASLAĆ 1958   10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250   71931/17 29/09/2017 Petar ĐUROVIĆ 1949 10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250   71938/17 29/09/2017 Radoš ŽIVKOVIĆ 1962 10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250   73023/17 29/09/2017 Olga ĆUBOVIĆ 1951 10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250   75578/17 19/10/2017 Zoran MILIĆEVIĆ 1954 10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250   75607/17 19/10/2017 Miloš TANASKOVIĆ 1958 10/09/2020 24/06/2020 1,000 250   75861/17 19/10/2017 Milka TERZIĆ 1956 10/09/2020 25/06/2020 1,000 250   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. 2 Less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level. 3 Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.