CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 8 avril 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF06D3D4E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s26F67D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:3pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 14252/18 Anton Nikolayevich SOKHATSKIY against Russia and 13 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 8   April   2021 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 29 April 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     14252/18 12/03/2018 Anton Nikolayevich SOKHATSKIY 1979     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 03/07/2020 29/01/2021 6,000     52184/18 25/10/2018 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich REVKOV 1982       15/02/2021 20/01/2021 6,000     1859/19 18/12/2018 Shamil Kurmanovich CHEKKUYEV 1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention and poor conditions of transport as well as in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by train and van and detention in transit facilities from 02/07 to 31/07/2018; 0.4 sq. m of personal space; no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-1 and IK-31 Komi Republic since 31/08/2018, less than 2 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, passive smoking, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of potable water 15/02/2021 30/11/2020 7,800     38533/19 02/07/2019 Denis Nikolayevich SHAROV 1986     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/02/2021 03/12/2020 6,000     58353/19 01/04/2020 Aleksey Leonidovich KOLOBOV 1973     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/02/2021 15/12/2020 6,000     60953/19 28/10/2019 Aslan Yusupovich ELMURZAYEV 1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport and in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by train and van between 19/03/2019 and 06/05/2019 and then on 25/01/2020; 0.3 sq. m of personal space; lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of ventilation, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places 15/02/2021 27/11/2020 7,000     4539/20 27/12/2019   AND   21208/19 02/04/2019 Household Lyubov Leonidovna BASMANOVA 1955   Vladimir Karpovich BASMANOV 1945   Vladimir Vladimirovich BASMANOV 1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 03/09/2020 09/09/2020 6,000     13672/20 04/02/2020 Shamsutdin Magomedovich SAPARCHAYEV 1980 Isayev Ayndi Khamzatovich Krasnoyarsk   15/02/2021 29/01/2021 6,000     13883/20 14/02/2020 Lyubov Vitalyevna KUCHULOVA 1954     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/02/2021 07/12/2020 6,000   24944/20 15/07/2019 Nataliya Sergeyevna DEMYANOVA 1976   Shaydullov Azat Zaydyatovich Elban Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/02/2021 02/02/2021 6,000   25964/20 03/04/2020 Aleksandr Borisovich SAVCHUK 1977     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region since 29/01/2010; 1.1 - 2.4 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities 15/02/2021 04/12/2020 7,800   27004/20 04/06/2020 Pavel Viktorovich PANKOV 1997       15/02/2021 02/12/2020 6,000   27191/20 06/04/2020 Yevgeniy Vladimirovich LAGODICH 1985       15/02/2021 02/12/2020 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.