CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 mai 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7486CA7E { width:0.34pt; display:inline-block } .s574E4C05 { width:124.18pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 16947/16 Cătălin PANGLICĂ against Romania and 13 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 20   May 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 June 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction   Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     16947/16 07/06/2016 Cătălin PANGLICĂ 1984     04/08/2016 17/12/2020 29/12/2020 Signed for receipt by the representative of the prison administration   28/01/2021 In detention at Giurgiu Prison.     27295/16 08/06/2016 Balazs GABOR 1985     26/03/2019 12/01/2021 27/01/2021 Illegible signature   23/02/2021 In detention at Aiud Prison.     27315/16 07/07/2016 Gheorghe PANŢURU 1983     15/09/2020 05/02/2021 16/02/2021 Signed for receipt by the representative of the prison administration   05/03/2021 In detention at Giurgiu Prison.     32774/16 24/06/2016 Vasile MOLDOVAN 1987     31/08/2016 02/02/2021 12/02/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother   02/03/2021 19/12/2018     34763/16 04/07/2016 Nicolae CRIȘCA 1973     08/09/2020 05/02/2021 19/02/2021 Signed for receipt by relative   05/03/2021 10/07/2018     37658/16 14/06/2016 Ionuţ-Grigore MATEI 1987     20/12/2016 22/01/2021 08/02/2021 According to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service   19/02/2021 In detention at Drobeta Turnu Severin Prison.     39559/16 16/08/2016 Marian-Gabriel SCHIRGHER 1986     08/09/2020 05/02/2021 15/02/2021 According to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service   05/03/2021 In detention at Giurgiu Prison.     39613/16 18/10/2016 Nicolae MAXIM 1984     18/10/2016 11/01/2021 21/01/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s wife 22/02/2021 According to the information provided by Romanian prison authorities, the applicant is no longer in detention. No information is however available in relation to the date of his release.       40829/16 17/08/2016 Mircea-Adrian CHIOREAN 1988       15/08/2020 05/02/2021 26/02/2021 Illegible signature 05/03/2021 20/03/2018   49750/16 13/09/2016 Nicolae OLTEANU 1959     23/09/2020 05/02/2021 16/02/2021 Signed for receipt by the representative of the prison administration   05/03/2021 In detention at Drobeta Turnu Severin Prison.   50288/16 31/01/2017 Gheorghe-Nicolae MARE 1990 Lacrima-Cristina Stan Cluj-Napoca 31/01/2017 02/09/2020 The letter sent to the applicant’s representative, a lawyer, returned to the Court as “unclaimed” on 22/09/2020   14/10/2020 In detention at Bistrița Prison.   60316/16 04/11/2016 Marcel LACZI 1987     29/10/2020 05/02/2021 18/02/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant   05/03/2021 In detention at Bistrița Prison.   60526/16 14/10/2016 Ion BRĂNESCU 1977     05/09/2019 05/02/2021 16/02/2021 Signed for receipt by the representative of the prison administration   05/03/2021 In detention at Arad Prison   29791/17 08/05/2017 Nicolae BISTRAN 1959     08/05/2017 22/01/2021 15/02/2021 Returned to the Court according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service   19/02/2021 24/04/2019