CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 mai 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sC9E44DFD { height:47pt } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .s9CEB4500 { height:38.9pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 46887/18 Amangeldy Sebepovich TELYUBAYEV against Russia and 10 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 20 May 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 June 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 § 1 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     46887/18 20/09/2018 Amangeldy Sebepovich TELYUBAYEV 1977   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - since 16/01/2018 the applicant is detained in IK-37 Perm Region; no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, overcrowding, inadequate temperature 03/03/2021 12/01/2021 7,800     54489/18 07/11/2018 Igor Valeryevich VINOGRADOV 1983     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 03/03/2021 15/12/2020 6,000     7721/19 15/12/2018 Maksim Alekseyevich SAVIN 1978   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region, since 10/01/2015 and pending, 2.3 sq. m of personal space; lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to running water, poor quality of food, overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light 03/03/2021 11/01/2021 7,800     24921/19 26/06/2019 Vitaliy Sergeyevich LUTSENKO 1984   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van on 04-06/02/2019, 0.3 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of seat belts 03/03/2021 19/01/2021 7,000     37143/19 01/07/2019 Ali Khasanovich KHASAYEV 1981       03/03/2021 20/01/2021 6,000     46535/19 10/08/2019 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich TUMANOV 1972   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-8 Komi Republic since 04/06/2015 and pending; overcrowding, inadequate clothing allowance, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food 03/03/2021 04/02/2021 7,800     11876/20 08/05/2020 Grigoriy Valeryevich KURDYUKOV 1990     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 03/03/2021 11/01/2021 6,000     13176/20 05/08/2020 Stanislav Nikolayevich SHEMYAKIN 1971   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 03/03/2021 11/02/2021 6,000     22984/20 12/05/2020 Artur Khavazhiyevich SAKKAYEV 1982   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport, in respect of poor conditions of detention and allocation of the applicant to a remote colony (the applicant submitted in vain several requests for relocation due to the family reasons to the Federal Prison Service (on 10/03/2016, 10/06/2016, 25/06/2020, 21/07/2020)),   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in EKPT in IK-49 Komi Republic since 11/06/2020 and pending; overcrowding; poor sanitary conditions, 2 sq. m. of personal space; lack of fresh air, etc.,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by train from 04/03/2020 to 05/03/2020, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, passive smoking 03/03/2021 02/02/2021 7,800   26057/20 10/08/2020 Nikolay Nikolayevich RUSAKOV 1984       03/03/2021 15/01/2021 6,000   42080/20 07/08/2020 Zaur Magomed ogly BULIYEV 1990     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 03/03/2021 02/02/2021 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.