CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 mai 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7486CA7E { width:0.34pt; display:inline-block } .s1A49D00F { width:134.84pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 49504/17 Muharrem Zeki ÖZCAN against Turkey and 14 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 20   May 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Carlo Ranzoni,   Pauliine Koskelo, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letters. By letters dated 18 December 2020, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 15 October 2020 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants received these letters between 7 and 28 January 2021. However, no response followed. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of these applications. Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 June 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Branko Lubarda Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX     No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 49504/17 27/03/2017 Muharrem Zeki ÖZCAN 1970 Ankara Turkish Hasan Hüseyin ERDOĞAN 2. 60360/17 07/07/2017 Süleyman Tuna DİKMEN 1985 Aydın Turkish Aydın YILMAZ 3. 66700/17 18/05/2017 Uğur Doğan ÇETİN 1982 İstanbul Turkish Recep SEYHAN 4. 20328/18 16/04/2018 Ömer Faruk KALKAN 1982 Malatya Turkish Deniz SEZGİN 5. 20374/18 17/04/2018 Fatih KURTBECER 1984 KOCAELİ Turkish Halil İbrahim DELİGÖNÜL 6. 24736/18 17/05/2018 Eyüp SAVCI 1978 Tekirdağ Turkish - 7. 32394/18 21/06/2018 Mustafa Kemal TEPEDELEN 1962 Ankara Turkish Hasan Hüseyin ERDOĞAN 8. 33166/18 05/07/2018 Zeka KAYALI 1966 Ankara Turkish Altan KAYABAŞI 9. 33881/18 17/07/2018 Mustafa YILMAZ 1972 Aydin Turkish Ahmet KOCABAŞ 10. 34784/18 04/07/2018 Cengiz KÜTÜK 1985 Kayseri Turkish   Memnune AKYILDIZ 11. 37425/18 01/08/2018 Volkan YILDIZ 1980 Ankara Turkish Ayşe Gül HACIOĞLU AVCI 12. 39329/18 06/08/2018 Mehmet ÇEKİÇ 1969 Hatay Turkish Aziz CANATAR 13. 39829/18 08/08/2018 Ali YILDIZ 1973 Ankara Turkish Abdullatif SERT 14. 40374/18 10/08/2018 Osman Nesuh YILDIZ 1978 Elazığ Turkish Engin ÇELEBİ 15. 9453/19 29/01/2019 Selim ÖGLÜ 1987 Şırnak Turkish Galip KUBATLI