CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 juin 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s102F6B48 { width:30.45pt; display:inline-block } .s5AAEE4F1 { width:148.75pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF06D3D4E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 63817/19 István BATKI and Others against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 17 June 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Péter Paczolay,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 July 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Attila Teplán   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/registration Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     63817/19 02/12/2019 (54 applicants) István BATKI 1975 Istvánné AGÓCS 1968 B & S ELASTIC GUMI ÉS MŰANYAGIPARI KFT 1994 B+K TRADE KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ KFT 1996 Mihály BELLA 1967 Józsefné BIRKÁS 1957 Pál BÍRÓ 1944 Jánosné BÓDI 1956 József BODONOVICS 1949 B-TRIÓ 93 MEZŐGAZDASÁGI, IPARI, KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ BT 1993 CLEAN-TRADE 2000 TAKARÍTÓ ÉS KERESKEDELMI KFT 2000 CONTACT-D IRÁNYÍTÁSTECHNIKA KFT 1998   János CSIZMADIA 1951 László DÁVID 1951   ELEKTRO-GENERÁL IPARI, KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ KFT 2002 ENVISZAM KÖRNYEZETVÉDELMI KFT 2001 Sándor ERDŐS 1973 Béla GODA 1961 Imre József HAJDÚ 1949 Zsolt Imre HAJDÚ 1971 Andor Attila HEGEDŰS 1974 János Sándor HOMOKI 1944 JUNG 2000 KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ KFT 1996 János KÉKI 1938 KELET-BOX KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ KFT 1999   KIS SZERELŐ ÉS KERESKEDŐ KFT 1991 KISS-JUHÁSZ KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ BT 1999 Antal Tibor KÓKAI 1956   László LÁNG 1982 MANZARD TETŐFEDŐ SZOLGÁLTATÓ KFT 1998 József MOHÁCSI 1971 NYÍR-AKÁC MEZŐGAZDASÁGI TERMELŐ BT 1993 Csaba OROSHÁZI 1946 PALOTÁSI KACSAFARM KFT 1991 PANDAN MŰANYAGFELDOLGOZÓ ÉS KÖRNYEZETTECHNIKAI KFT 1992 PÉTER-BODNÁR EGÉSZSÉGÜGYI KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ BT 1992 PÉTERFI & SZABÓ NEMZETKÖZI FUVAROZÁSI KFT 1997 András PORUMB 1963 PROJECT FOOD KFT 1997 Ildikó PUTNOKI 1969 RRE-SZEGED NYOMDAIPARI KFT. 1991 SEBŐK-LÚD LÚDTENYÉSZTŐ ÉS KFT 1995 Lajos STRANSZKI 1959 SZAKI-TOURS SZOLGÁLTATÓ ÉS KERESKEDELMI KFT 2006 SZÉKI-LÚD TERMELŐ ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ KFT 2007 Imre TÓTH 1944 TRENDIX KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ KFT 1991 TURMIX ÉPÍTŐIPARI, TELEPÜLÉSTISZTASÁGI KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ BT 1992 Imre VAS 1955 Árpád VINCZE 1965 VIZ-KONTROLL IPARI, KERESKEDELMI ÉS SZOLGÁLTATÓ KFT 1997 Mihályné WEIGERT 1963 Household Imre RÁBAI 1957 Imréné RÁBAI 1959 Kodela Viktor Budapest   17/02/2021 06/07/2020 5,900     18846/20 20/04/2020 László KOMLÓSI 1952 Tamás Ildikó Nyíregyháza   31/08/2020 06/04/2021 2,600     33029/20 30/07/2020 János Ákos HORVÁTH 1960 Pivarnyikné Juhász Emőke Budapest   06/05/2021 13/01/2021 7,800     33036/20 21/07/2020 János Simon GULYÁS 1947     Neizer Norbert Budapest   04/05/2021 04/05/2021 9,100     33722/20 27/07/2020 Diána Annamária NAGYNÉ DÓCS 1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 23/04/2021 10/03/2021 3,300     33934/20 30/07/2020 Vilmos SZENDRÉNYI 1959       29/03/2021 26/04/2021 2,000     41306/20 08/09/2020 Zoltán KOVÁCS 1963       01/04/2021 28/04/2021 1,800     42479/20 11/09/2020 Erika Piroska LÁSZLÓ 1954       08/04/2021 05/01/2021 5,200     45085/20 14/09/2020 Sándor ILOVSZKY 1964 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 15/04/2021 26/01/2021 7,800   53617/20 18/11/2020 Natália SZŰCS 1973 Lajos SZŰCS 1969 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 13/04/2021 28/01/2021 2,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.