CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 1 juillet 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 49187/19 Pavel Yevgenyevich OSTROVSKIY against Russia and 17 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 1   July 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention (see the appended table). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 22 July 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 § 1 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant / household (in euros) [1]     49187/19 28/08/2019   AND   33574/20 14/07/2020 Household Pavel Yevgenyevich OSTROVSKIY 1995 Irina Aleksandrovna KULIKOVA 1977       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/02/2021 08/04/2021 6,000     8201/20 16/01/2020   AND   31794/20 07/07/2020   Household Ruslan Vladimirovich BURYAK 1977 Natalya Nikolayevna BURYAK 1973 Nadezhda Ivanovna BURYAK 1950 Olesya Ruslanovna BURYAK 2004 Vladimir Andreyevich BURYAK 1943         15/02/2021 05/01/2021 6,000     17365/20 31/08/2020 Vitaliy Nikolayevich KONOVALOV 1982       29/04/2021 04/03/2021 6,000     21647/20 27/04/2020 Svetlana Ivanovna MARTYNOVA 1974     Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - taken in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention (on 12/03/2020 the applicant was transferred from the colony to a remand prison in Rostov; she complains that, being detained there, she can no longer benefit from long family visits which she had been afforded and had a right to under the national law when she was serving her prison sentence in the colony) 10/03/2021 14/04/2021 7,800     35569/20 22/09/2020 Household Vitaliy Yuryevich SAFONOV 1982 Anna Ivanovna SAFONOVA 1960     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 29/04/2021 22/02/2021 6,000     44534/20 21/09/2020 Household Aleksandr Andreyevich ISAKOV 1985 Irina Anatolyevna DOBRYAKOVA 1968     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 29/04/2021 18/03/2021 6,000     45902/20 15/09/2020 Arayk Ashotovich TARPOSHYAN 1987       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 29/04/2021 19/02/2021 6,000     45903/20 13/09/2020 Vasiliy Alekseyevich FRANCHUK 1987       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 29/04/2021 03/03/2021 6,000     45904/20 22/09/2020 Adam Saadulayevich SHAKHRUDINOV 1974     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 29/04/2021 22/02/2021 6,000   46116/20 19/08/2020 Artem Yuryevich ZHELIBA 1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 29/04/2021 18/03/2021 6,000   46118/20 31/08/2020 Dmitriy Mikhaylovich PROKHOROV 1980       29/04/2021 03/03/2021 6,000   46981/20 24/09/2020 Olga Yevgenyevna KISELEVA 1967       29/04/2021 19/02/2021 6,000   46984/20 18/09/2020 Andrey Ivanovich ZIMAREV 1974       29/04/2021 12/03/2021 6,000   46985/20 25/09/2020 Vladimir Aleksandrovich MAKSIMOV 1978       29/04/2021 22/02/2021 6,000   47258/20 04/10/2020 Zarifzhon Nurulloyevich MIRZONAZAROV 1981 Kudryavtsev Aleksey Gennadyevich Kolpino Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 29/04/2021 28/02/2021 6,000   47806/20 06/10/2020 Anton Aleksandrovich YERMOLAYEV 1975     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 29/04/2021 19/03/2021 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.