CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 23 septembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sA68E35A7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 20046/16 Ervin HAGIVELI against Romania and 14 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23   September 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 October 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of Observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     20046/16 11/05/2016 Ervin HAGIVELI 1980 07/03/2017 24/03/2021 Letter returned to sender on 16/04/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 05/05/2021 15/11/2017     21350/16 16/05/2016 Ionuț BĂLĂCEANU 1993 01/02/2017 13/01/2021 Letter returned to sender on 09/02/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 24/02/2021 03/05/2018     26213/16 01/06/2016 Costică VLAD 1984 08/09/2016   28/04/2021 10/05/2021 Signed by the applicant’s mother 09/06/2021 14/11/2017     51314/16 31/10/2016 Ștefan ȘERBAN 1980 24/03/2017 13/01/2021 26/01/2021 Signed by the applicant 24/02/2021 06/11/2018     54383/16 25/10/2016 Marin PATÂR 1965 25/01/2021 02/02/2021 Letter returned from Galați prison on 08/03/2021 as recipient “moved from the address” 16/03/2021 In detention according to Romanian prison authorities.     57176/16 31/10/2016 Constantin COTAE 1989 30/03/2017   18/01/2021 Handed over to the recipient on 26/01/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 01/03/2021 In detention in Giurgiu prison     58508/16 14/11/2016 Marian ILIE 1970 24/02/2017 19/10/2020 Letter returned to sender on 20/11/2020 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 27/11/2020 In detention in Giurgiu prison     4630/17 03/02/2017 Nicolae GHEORGHE 1985 24/05//2017   19/11/2020 Letter returned from home address on 21/01/2021 as recipient “moved from the address” 04/01/2021 05/03/2019     7268/17 27/02/2017 Gheorghe Trandafir NONU 1985 11/05/2017   12/03/2021 Letter returned to sender on 01/04/2021 (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post) 23/04/2021 27/08/2019   18590/19 11/09/2019 Marian SÎRBU 1978 17/09/2019   18/05/2021 08/06/2021 Signed by the applicant 29/06/2021 05/09/2019   34713/19 02/08/2019 Ștefan BALINT 1949 18/09/2019   18/05/2021 10/06/2021 Illegible signature 29/06/2021 -   38209/19 27/08/2019 Ghiocel BALMOȘ 1969 04/08/2020   18/05/2021 07/06/2021 Illegible signature 29/06/2021 In detention in Arad prison   62293/19 06/01/2020 Sabin PÎRVAN 1973 29/10/2020   18/05/2021 03/06/2021 Signed by the applicant’s mother 29/06/2021 10/10/2020   4853/20 05/02/2020 Vasile DĂILĂ 1961 16/10/2020   18/05/2021 17/06/2021 Illegible signature 29/06/2021 04/07/2020   7245/20 25/02/2020 Alexandru IEREMIE 1992 24/04/2020   18/05/2021 04/06/2021 Signed by the applicant’s mother 29/06/2021 31/08/2020