CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 octobre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s376CDD9C { width:117.08pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF0674627 { height:64.8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 25744/16 Ștefan-Alexandru NIȚĂ against Romania and 11 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 21   October 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 November 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Armen Harutyunyan   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter New time-limit for submission of observations by the applicant Date of the applicant’s release from prison     25744/16 24/06/2016 Ștefan-Alexandru NIȚĂ 1991     28/04/2017 24/03/2021 07/04/2021 Illegible signature   05/05/2021 01/11/2017     41371/16 28/09/2016 Costică BÎGU 1963 Ovidiu Chiriac Brașov 28/09/2016 01/06/2021 A first letter sent to the applicant’s representative was handed over to the representative’s mother on 21/10/2020   The letter sent to the applicant was signed for receipt on 16/06/2021 Illegible signature   13/07/2021 07/11/2018     41422/16 29/08/2016 Marius-Daniel ȚIȚIRIGĂ 1989     21/11/2016 01/04/2021 14/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother 13/05/2021 16/10/2018     43193/16 25/08/2016 Mihai CÂRMACIU 1975     25/08/2016 01/04/2021 14/04/2021 Illegible signature   13/05/2021 In detention in Vaslui Prison according to the Government’s observations of 20/01/2020       36514/18 22/04/2019 Nicolae Dănuț DĂNCEANU 1975     22/04/2019 09/04/2021 19/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant 21/05/2021 19/11/2019     50042/18 13/12/2018 Doru-Claudiu TURȘII 1993     13/12/2018 09/04/2021 19/04/2021 Illegible signature   21/05/2021 10/04/2019     2365/19 30/01/2019 Ionuț STAMATE 1997     02/04/2019 09/04/2021 20/04/2021 Illegible signature   21/05/2021 In detention in Giurgiu Prison according to the Government’s observations of 19/10/2020       5927/19 28/02/2019 Florin-Andrei GHEREBEN 1988     28/02/2019 31/05/2021 14/06/2021 Illegible signature   12/07/2021 02/04/2020     28344/19 19/08/2019 Ion-Marius MIRIȚĂ 1986     18/06/2020 14/04/2021 27/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s father 26/05/2021 18/05/2020   33641/19 10/06/2019 Ion-Cornel NILĂ 1980     17/09/2020 09/04/2021 19/04/2021 Illegible signature 21/05/2021 09/07/2019   61924/19 24/12/2019 Alin-Ionel CRISTEA 1980     03/03/2020 31/05/2021 15/06/2021 Signed for receipt by the Arad Prison’s representative 12/07/2021 In detention in Arad Prison according to the Government’s observations of 15/01/2021   7595/20 18/02/2020 Gheorghe CÎRSTOV 1981     27/04/2020 20/04/2021 28/04/2021 Signed for receipt by the Craiova Prison’s representative 01/06/2021 In detention in Craiova Prison according to the Government’s observations of 19/10/2020